Chris Deutschmann
My feedback
-
17 votes
Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Deutschmann commented
I add my vote to this. We have a number of fields, specifically picklist where records might have inactive values set in them so when doing data deployment these records fail. however the fields might not be critical to the data deployment, so being able to exclude them will allow the data deployment to complete without skipping records that we otherwise need, but not necessarily all the data in the record.
Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Deutschmann commented
I add my vote to this. We have a number of use cases where we would like to specify values into fields for testing and also to possibly clear out fields that we know will fail e.g. the field is a picklist and some records might have inactive values, so clearing or selecting a standard value would be useful
Chris Deutschmann supported this idea ·
This will help with masking fields not supported by the data mask or where data mask options are not suitable to use case.