Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1304 results found
-
Remove "No Difference" items when commenting on jira tickets
when i connect a jira ticket to a commit, I like the way gearset posts a comment on the jira ticket listing the changed items. what I dont like is the long list of "no difference" items posted on the ticket. It makes the ticket comments super long and annoying to scroll through. can gearset update this to only post the difference metadatas, or at least give us the option to include or exclude
8 votes -
add the ability to set a Profile Picture
Honestly I'm actually surprised it's not possible to set an avatar at the moment, it seems a pretty basic feature in today's online world!
As a neurodivergent team, we want to increase accessibility by being able to distinguish our team members within the platform faster and more easily, so that we can increase our productivity.
It's simply easier to recognise my user in GS if it's "the one with the funny cat" instead of just my initials. Similarly, since we have team members with the same initials that also makes it harder to distinguish them in GearSet since their profile…
5 votes -
reduce the size of the "maintenance" banner and/or allow me to dismiss it.
reduce the size of the "maintenance" banner and/or allow me to dismiss it. It cuts into my available screen size too much. Dismiss with an option to not show "this" maintenance message again would be ideal
4 votes -
Darkmode option
It would be really helpful having a dark mode of gearset UI. A big number of devs prefer dark mode over bright mode. Since gearset is a tool mainly used by devs, would be good to give to devs the option to customize their UI.
3 votes -
Feature Request: Deployment Blocking Based on Daily Unit Test Job Status
Currently, Gearset lacks a feature to block deployment CI jobs to the respective environments when the associated daily unit test job fails. Implementing this feature would be advantageous in ensuring that appropriate testing quality gates are established to prevent changes from being deployed in the event of test failures. This enhancement would significantly improve our deployment integrity and testing processes.
3 votes -
Please add support for decomposeCustomLabelsBeta
Salesforce added the option to configure multiple features in the DX Project Configuration file. One of the is breaking down the big CustomLabels file into individual files where we no longer need to deploy the whole file but just a file (label) that has changes in. Please see SFDX Documentation here - https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.sfdx_dev.meta/sfdx_dev/sfdx_dev_ws_config.htm
11 votes -
Stop Off-setting Partial Selections when a Package is 'Fetched' for the Latest
Hi,
Our team creates individual draft deployment packages and then we consolidate it into one package and fetch for the latest before validating. In some of our individual draft deployment packages we are selecting partial changes to a page layout or a lightning record page but it is off-setting this partial change and we are given the prompt: 'Precision selections have been reset for these items'. Is there a way we can fetch for the latest without off-setting these partial changes?
Thanks!
2 votes -
Always sort results by Name (alphabetically) as a second-level sort
If a sort has been applied to any column other than Name, apply a secondary sort to "Name" so the rows always sort alphabetically by Name.
This is most useful when sorting by Metadata Type, I'd like the results to be grouped first by Metadata Type, but then I'd like to see the results sorted alphabetically by their name.
Even if the user is sorting by Changed On, for example - if there are 100 fields all deployed on the exact same date/time (ex. Mar 26, 2025 1:19pm), you might as well sort them alphabetically by Name as well
I…
2 votes -
Precision Deployments for Flow
Please add Flow for Precision Deployment. The new flow visualization has been really great and it would be very helpful to be able to use precision deployments with them.
20 votes -
Dependency-Aware Deployment Sequencing in Gearset
Currently, deployments in Gearset can fail when interdependent metadata components are deployed simultaneously without respecting their dependencies. For example, deploying a new Lightning page that references a report or dashboard will fail if both are included in the same deployment, as the referenced report or dashboard does not yet exist in the target org.
While the current workaround is to manually split deployments into separate feature branches based on dependencies, a more intuitive approach would be for Gearset to detect these dependencies automatically when multiple related components are included in a deployment. The tool could then offer options to handle…
3 votes -
Add option to send notification to the Webex Teams for the Unit tests with the failed tests
Add option to send notification to the Webex Teams for the Unit tests with the failed tests. While setting up a new unit test job for one of our Salesforce orgs I have observed that there in no option to send the notification to the Webex Teams chats. It would be critical to our org as we use Webex.
2 votes -
Provide the ability to get a deployment report on multiple deployment packages
Instead of having to download the deployment report individually for multiple deployments, I would like to be able to select multiple deployments and download one report that contains a list of all files that were deployed as part of the multiple deployments. It is too cumbersome to manually download a report or .csv for each deployment and then copy/paste the info into one location so that I can get a comprehensive list of all files that were deployed.
9 votes -
scroll bars
Get rid of the scroll bars in the open pull requests tab caused by the queue section overflowing its bounds.
Also, allow us to post screenshots here. :\
1 vote -
Audit changes to the "Require issue tracking" setting
As a result of a query by our auditors it would be helpful to have changes to the 'Require issue tracking' deployment setting audited. They are concerned that a team-owner could alter this to perform a deployment then reinstate it, resulting in change deployment without tracking.
1 vote -
Make pre/post deployment steps conditional on developer sandboxes.
Pre/Post deployment notes can be set to pertains to various static environments but they always apply to sandboxes after a back deploy. This should be conditional-- most of the time I only set them applicable to prod and they aren't applicable to developer sandboxes.
2 votes -
Add "Open Branches" Tab to Development Sandbox Environments in Pipeline
The only way to deploy an existing feature branch into a development sandbox is to perform a manual compare and deploy. Previously, we had our developer sandboxes set up as static environments which allowed us to create PRs against them for "re-deploy". This is not possible with the new Development Sandbox format. I suggest another tab be added called "Open Branches" which will allow the developers to select a feature to pull and work on in their development environment. That way we get the benefit of easy compare & deploy instead of having to manually compare and deploy. This will…
4 votes -
sandbox seeding size
When deploying data to sandboxes, it would be helpful to get an approximation of the amount of data and file space a seeding job will need. I have on numerous occasions hit storage limits as a developer sandbox only has 200 megabytes of usable space.
1 vote -
Add an option to ignore ".forceignore" files
When a repository contains a forceignore file, deployments to that repo will not include these elements.
Sometime however it might be necessary to explicitly deploy these elements (e.g. manually).I propose to add a flag "Ignore .forceignore" at least for manual comparisons + deploys to be able to still push generelly ignore components to the repository.
1 vote -
It would be great to have a centralized way to view all components and static code analysis results for every commit within a branch.
It would be great to have a centralized view for all components and static code analysis results across every commit within a feature branch. For example, if a developer makes five commits to the same branch, it would be much more efficient to review the components and static code analysis results for the entire branch in one place, rather than checking each commit individually through the deployment history. Additionally, there should be an export option to easily share the results with developers. Thanks
3 votes -
Show duration for comparison jobs
While the Comparison History screen shows when a comparison job was initiated, it would be extremely helpful to display the duration of that comparison job, from when it was initiated, to when it was completed.
Ideally, this would show on the Comparison History screen, and/or on the actual Comparison screen itself after it was completed.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?