Help us improve Gearset

Welcome to the Gearset feedback forum. We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better.

Post your ideas and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you. We’re keen to hear about product improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike. We check this forum regularly and will keep ideas updated with their current status. If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

I suggest you ...

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Adding Custom destructive

    ANT is unable to change the type on an EmailTemplate from HTML to CUSTOM. To solve that we need to add the EmailTemplate first to the destructive package to have it removed and then add it again with the package.xml
    Since this file is not deleted but just changed. It doesn't show up in the deleted items tab.

    We should add an option to the "Selected Items"/"Changed Items" list to opt-in for adding that to the destructive.

    8 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    • Output information after CI Job regarding problem analyzer skipping some component deployment

      I would like to get some information from the problem analyzer after a CI Job completes as it seems like if it detects a problem during the job it skips deploying some of the components, like user permissions.

      5 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
      • Allow adding "No Difference" items to package. To help with package reuse to multiple orgs

        Allow assets with "no difference" to be added to a promotion to allow the same package to be used to both promote as well as sync other sandboxes (without having to manually check if asset was changed in each).

        11 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

        • Enhance XML meta data comparison to ignore changes in XML order

          In org monitoring we frequently get notification about changes an the only thing is a change to the order of the XML elements returned.
          The XML is virtually the same but the order of elements returned changed from one day to the other.

          It makes differentiating "real" changes from those false positives time-consuming.

          It would be great if those kind of changes could be ignored or if there was an option to configure the XML comparison behavior for each monitoring job.

          4 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

          • Allow other Enterprise Users who do not own the CI Job to run it

            Enterprise Users can only "Run Now" Jobs that they own. If the Source and Destination Org are shared, allow other enterprise users to run the job.

            13 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

            • CI deployment failure details in webhooks

              Webhooks for CI deployment failures simply say "Deployment failed with (179/180 components deployed)" instead of describing the failure in more detail, including the Object and Error Message

              4 votes
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)

                We’ll send you updates on this idea

              • Include logic operator choices in Data Deployments

                Currently Data Deployments only allow filtering on
                [FIELD] = [VALUE]

                It would be beneficial to be able to include other logic operators such as:
                NOT EQUALS
                LIKE
                IN
                GREATER THAN
                LESS THAN

                etc.

                2 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  1 comment  ·  Data  ·  Admin →
                • Possibility to deploy to another sandboxe when a ci job passed

                  When configuring a CI job, we need an option to set a deployment to another sandboxe when the deployment or test classes run successfully in the current CI Job.
                  Ex: when a push to a branch on VCS triggers a CI job to deploy to a sandboxe like QA (with test classes run), we also have the possibility to set an auto deployment to staging sanboxe when the the job on QA passed successfully.

                  2 votes
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  • offer the capability to exclude items in a metadata filter using a regex pattern

                    If we can exclude certain things in the comparison filters, all other newly created things are automatically provided with the CI job that uses my comparison filters.

                    For example, at the moment in "custom filters", if I select the type "custom object" and disable "all elements", I can filter and choose which objects we want to compare.

                    -> We need the option to invert the filter. To be able to select the specific objects that do not want to compare and deploy (like "Not: regex: waste_ | QA_ | staging123_").

                    10 votes
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    • Ability to chose multiple targets for a deployment

                      It would be nice to be able to deploy to multiple environments all at once from one source.

                      10 votes
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                        0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
                      • When running "Compare and Deploy", or via a similar mechanism, allow the target to be a local zip

                        In rarer situations where I need to make some manual adjustments to the metadata XML for a deployment, I'd like to be able to download the metadata to adjust it. Today you need to go through a compare, and at the end, you can download the package, but this can be problematic, since you have to choose the target org, there need to be differences, etc.

                        Instead, it would be useful to just choose the source org, select the metadata items, and save the package, without a target org needed.

                        1 vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
                        • In the compare and deploy results, having the ability to "refresh" a single line item

                          This would be extremely useful when dealing with small errors. A quick fix could be made in the source org to a single item, the item could be refreshed quickly and than the deployment could succeed.

                          2 votes
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          • 2 votes
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)

                              We’ll send you updates on this idea

                            • Better pre-selection of repos & branches

                              My reasoning for the need:
                              Every day when comparing, I have to choose one github repo out of 343 (46 of mine + 297 from an org I'm a part of). Yes I know I can type some characters and it will search the list of repos, but it's still unpractical. It sometimes looks like it remembers the choice, but I think it doesn't quite work after logout and I have to select the repo from the long list too often.

                              The bare minimum that would bring me pleasure:
                              The last used repo I used for any comparison would always…

                              2 votes
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)

                                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                              • Allow save into a draft deployment after Refresh Comparison

                                Use case:

                                Source is master, target is org
                                Create draft deployment between master and org; Save
                                ...time passes, new items are added to master
                                Open draft deployment
                                Refresh Comparison to see new items in master
                                Select new items
                                Click Save Draft Deployment --you have to create a new version (and no obvious way to even see the current draft's name without opening a new tab)

                                Seems like you should be able to save back into the same draft after refresh comparison (or at least have option to do so).

                                When you create a new version of the draft; you have…

                                2 votes
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
                                • create the ability to add components to an already run comparison or saved draft deployment

                                  The goal would be to be able to run a "mini comparison" in order to add a few components to a deployment that may be hitting an issue because it is missing one or two components. This would eliminate the need to run the whole comparison again.

                                  3 votes
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  • Default to Object View

                                    Option to default to Object View vs XML for metadata types that have it available

                                    7 votes
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                    • Allow the ability to "uncheck" No DIfference items on the Selected Items tab

                                      When cloning previous deployments, there are may cases where items may have been previously deployed, so the now would show as "No Difference". Currently these items can not be unselected for the deployment. It would be useful to be able to remove these from a current deployment to keep the deployment clean.

                                      1 vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                      • Support merge fields in outgoing webhooks of CI jobs

                                        When sending an outgoing webhook, I'd like to be able to include if the job succeeded, the name of the job etc.

                                        1 vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                          0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
                                        • Offer to push components that passed validation even if some items failed

                                          For large payloads (thousands of artifacts) it can be tedious to try to resolve a few minor issues when 99% of the package will deploy successfully. Having a feature to push stuff that passes validation would be helpful. Included in this in the deployment summary and deployment reports will be a count and list of items that failed validation and were omitted from the package so they can be investigated

                                          5 votes
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                          ← Previous 1 3 4 5 14 15
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base