Skip to content

Help us improve Gearset

We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.

If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

81 results found

  1. Support flow deletion at V44+

    if the target flow is deactivated; and all prior versions are deleted, you can't delete the last remaining flow version in the target org. The error you get is "Insufficient access rights on cross-reference id".

    Copado provides a solution (https://docs.copado.com/article/8l069zes9f-destructive-changes-in-copado-doesn-t-support-flow-and-process-builder) wherein the user can specify the contents of the destructive-changes.xml file (enumerating the versions to delete) but Gearset has no way to inject such a file into a compare/deploy (esp a CI deploy)

    with SFDC pushing more and more dev into Lightning Flow, deletions are inevitable in many orgs as things get refactored/renamed

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Add support for CMS Connect Sources

    Please add support for CMS Connect Sources in the comparison filters as well as the deployments and CI jobs.
    We're working with CMS Connect in our current developments of a customer community and we'd like to deploy this metadata as well.
    See the metadata api documentation: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_meta.meta/api_meta/meta_cmsconnectsource.htm

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Introduce 'ListView' as an option in 'Metadata filter' tab

    When navigating to the 'Metadata filter' tab to select filters, there are currently 122 options, however 'List View' is not one of them.
    When navigating 'Metadata Types & Components' in Workbench, 'ListView' is described independently, and I have used it previously when deploying via ANT. Therefore I would imagine there is a way to identify List Views independently of 'Custom Objects'.
    This would be a huge help with a Production monitoring job, as I do not mind if List Views are updated by certain users in Production, but currently they are flagged as differences. Basically, I want to ignore them…

    27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This is now released, you will need to update the metadata filter for any jobs set up already to take effect.
    You can now exclude list views as well as other subcomponents of custom object.
    (Note: named items is not populated for subcomponent metadata types.)

  4. Unique filename of the generated report PDF

    Currently, the name of the generated PDF file of the deployment report is always the same for a given source and target.

    If we deploy from our "master" gitlab branch to our "production" environment, the name will always be the same.

    We archive the report PDFs for documentation / compliance reasons, and we always have to manually rename the PDF file to make the name distinct.

    It would be nice if the name of the report PDF was unique. This could be achieved by either including a timestamp or the deployment number into the filename.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Select more than one item at the same time

    On "Items to include/exclude for Custom application" view, it would be really nice if we could select more than one item at the same time, using SHIFT shortcut.
    When clicking on "Named Item", and if you want to select from the 49th line to 63th line for example, and to avoid to select manually 15 lines with 15 clicks.
    We could just select the 49th line, and with SHIFT, click on the 63th line to select them.
    Thx

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. configure which problem analyzer results to use in CI jobs

    Being able to configure which problem analyser results to use in CI jobs.

    For instance, we can’t deploy any changes to managed packages because the problem analyser will ignore them (even though we have components from a managed package that we can modify and deploy without issues), that would help to reduce our manual steps during deployments.

    46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Support the CustomHelpMenuSection metadata item

    We use the CustomHelpMenuSection item to customise our Help & Training dropdown list in Salesforce, and we would like to include it in our deployments automatically.

    It's been available in the Metadata API since version 45, but Gearset doesn't appear to support it yet.

    Will it be available soon?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. There should be an option to schedule unit test jobs weekly in Gearset

    Hi Gearset,
    I would suggest you to provide an extra option where we can select weekly ,daily or monthly schedule jobs in Unit Testing Jobs.

    Thank you,

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Cloning package should copy over (prepopulate) description as well as friendly name.

    I find myself having to go to the original deployed package to copy the description information or coming up with a new description for the cloned package. Would be nice to have this brought over from the original when cloning a package.

    17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  5 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Keep the Deployment Friendly Name / Notes when you refresh a comparison

    Keep the Deployment Friendly Name / Notes when you refresh a comparison

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  3 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Ability to deploy remaining Omni-Channel Components

    For Omni-Channel deployments, QueueRoutingConfig metadata type is now supported by Gearset. However, corresponding PresenceUserConfigUser and UserServicePresence metadata types are not yet available. This means a secondary Metadata API tool (e.g. ANT, Workbench) or other manual steps are needed to complete an Omni-Channel deployment.

    Hoping all supported components for API deployment can be included in diffs for releasing all via Gearset.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Update the CI Jobs Page so you can organize, similar to Deployments History page.

    We have a bunch of CI Jobs, and it gets a bit difficult to identify whose job is owned by who just by looking at it.

    Maybe make it similar to the Deployment History tab where I can sort out things by clicking the options above like "Owner" or "Name" and it'll organize it the way the Deployment History tab you guys have in place.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. GitHub Pull request

    All user to submit pull request from within Gearset instead of having to jump out to GitHub.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Output information after CI Job regarding problem analyzer skipping some component deployment

    I would like to get some information from the problem analyzer after a CI Job completes as it seems like if it detects a problem during the job it skips deploying some of the components, like user permissions.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Enable deployment of unmanaged packages and Lightning Bolt Solutions from one Salesforce Sandbox to Another.

    Enable deployment of unmanaged packages and Lightning Bolt Solutions from one Salesforce Sandbox to Another.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. add support for Live Agent and Einstein Chat Bot

    We're using Live Agent and Einstein Chat bot but there is no way to deploy this in Gearset. Per Metadata API v43.0, these objects can be retrieved and deployed:

    • Bot
    • BotVersion
    • EmbeddedServiceBranding
    • EmbeddedServiceConfig
    • EmbeddedServiceLiveAgent
    • LiveAgentSettings
    • LiveChatAgentConfig
    • LiveChatButton
    • LiveChatDeployment
    • LiveChatSensitiveDataRule

    since we use Gearset for all deploys to source and to orgs; omitting LiveAgent and chat bots means we don't have a consistent way of maintaining truth

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  3 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Provide a desktop notification from browser when a validation or comparison is completed

    It would great if browser notifications could be created/enabled to notify a user when a validation or comparison is complete when the user is off the the browser tab where the validation or compare is happening.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  3 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Allow us to configure a push notification when comparisons are done.

    It would be great if we could configure a notification when a comparison completes. Sometimes comparisons take a long time!

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  2 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Sort order of Orgs ignores friendly name

    If you have friendly names for your org connections, the list of orgs presented on the Comparison page ignores these and instead sorts on sandbox name. Since the lines show friendly name left most; this is not natural to the human to see things out of order

    Example

    OrderFix (joe.blow@foo.com.story003)
    Invoicing (joe.blow@foo.com.story010)
    AlphaTest (joe.blow@foo.com.story091)

    when what the eye wants to see is:

    AlphaTest (joe.blow@foo.com.story091)
    Invoicing (joe.blow@foo.com.story010)
    OrderFix (joe.blow@foo.com.story003)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Active Link to Deployment Destination

    When you finish a deployment you get a "Deployment Summary" screen that has handy details. It does not, however, have a link to the commit/branch in Github or other site where the destination ended up. I have to jump to my Github page and refresh instead of having a direct link. Yes, it's a tiny feature but is useful for a Gearset newbie like me.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base