Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
307 results found
-
Add spell checker to CI/CD pipeline
Spell checker helps maintain a high standard of accuracy, ensuring your content is reviewed in initial PR's itself. Just like how we use Clayton code feedback.
If typos is in customer facing texts in UI (which is can be a big problem in public facing application where large no of users visits.)
It would be good if spell checker can be added as a policy inside Clayton. So that we can find and fix issues easily.
Advantages
* We can also prevent potential PROD P1 errors.
* Enhanced Code Quality
* Improved Deployment Efficiency
* Reduced Technical Debt5 votes -
Darkmode option
It would be really helpful having a dark mode of gearset UI. A big number of devs prefer dark mode over bright mode. Since gearset is a tool mainly used by devs, would be good to give to devs the option to customize their UI.
10 votes -
Add a feature to ignore queue members when deploying queues
When deploying Queues with Gearset the members section is automatically included and the member list is deployed to the target org. Gearset has a suggested fix to sync the queue members with the target environment but it doesn't always work.
Salesforce supports deploying queues with an empty list of users as queue members are more like data than metadata I suggest a feature toggle in Gearset where the users section of the queue is ignored for deployments to preserve the user list in the destination org.
Our company and many others probably maintain the queue users directly in production as…4 votes -
Ability to Select and Merge Specific Changes in Lightning Components and Flows
We are using Gearset to compare and merge changes in Lightning and Aura components, as well as Salesforce Flows. While the tool works well overall, we’ve noticed that it currently lacks the ability to select and move specific changes during a merge. Instead, it requires replacing the entire file, which isn’t ideal in many cases.
It would be extremely helpful if Gearset could allow selective merging of specific lines or sections—similar to how it works for Apex classes. This feature would greatly improve control and efficiency when working with Flows and Lightning components.
Thanks for considering this enhancement!
4 votes -
Pick up test classes to run from the apex class
Add a variable in apex classes where we can specify which test classes to run.
Recently you added the ability to specify the test classes to run on a pull request, which is great!
I know <ApexClassName>Test are automatically picked up by GS, but would be great if we could specify with
@TestClasses('CaseTestSuite,LeadTestSuite') or similar in the actual Apex Class and Gearset would automatically pick it up and add those test classes to the pull requests .3 votes -
Show doesRequireRecordChangedToMeetCriteria on Flow Navigator
The doesRequireRecordChangedToMeetCriteria toggle on flow Decisions doesn't show on Flow Navigator, making it harder to check for issues on builds when using the comparison tool.
doesRequireRecordChangedToMeetCriteria should show in the flow navigator, same as the rest of the decision configuration.
2 votes -
Allow multiple team members to be assigned to a single sandbox on the pipeline view
Currently a single team shared sandbox can have multiple users with delegated access. However, only one of the users can view the sandbox in a pipeline view. In order to allow multiple people to see the sandbox -
Current solutions:
- Add the same sandbox multiple times and assign each to the required team members
- Or, allow all team members to see all sandboxesSuggested solution:
- Allow multiple team members to be selected via the "Assign sandbox to team member" function.3 votes -
Remove "No Difference" items when commenting on jira tickets
when i connect a jira ticket to a commit, I like the way gearset posts a comment on the jira ticket listing the changed items. what I dont like is the long list of "no difference" items posted on the ticket. It makes the ticket comments super long and annoying to scroll through. can gearset update this to only post the difference metadatas, or at least give us the option to include or exclude
9 votes -
Automatically Backfill Dev Environments with Pull Request When Changes Are Promoted Downstream
Description:
Currently, Gearset’s pipeline tool does a great job of back-propagating changes between static environments when a change is made further down the pipeline. However, this behavior does not extend to developer environments, even if the change originated from a feature branch tied to that dev environment.Problem:
If a developer starts work on a branch in their dev environment, and then that branch is promoted down the pipeline (e.g., through UAT, Staging, etc.), and changes are made to the branch further down (e.g., hotfixes, last-minute edits), those updates do not automatically get proposed back to the original dev environment.…
1 vote -
Add Monday.com as a source for User Stories
Add Monday.com as a source for user story integration
1 vote -
Enhancement Proposal: De-merge Option for Gearset Branch Management
Currently, Gearset provides a helpful feature to merge branches, which is ideal for creating a Release branch that bundles all related components. However, it would be a valuable enhancement to introduce a de-merge or selective unmerge capability. This would allow teams to easily remove specific feature branches from a Release branch particularly useful in scenarios where some stories are pending approval or need to be excluded from the release at the last minute.
Such a feature would improve flexibility during final release preparation and reduce the need for manual branch adjustments or rework.1 vote -
Delete Flow by Version Number
It would be beneficial to delete specific inactive flow versions. Examples where this would help streamline deployment changes:
You need to delete a custom field that is used in a flow. You create a new version of a flow, remove the dependency on the custom field and activate the new flow. Now you want to remove the flow version that still has the custom field dependency. Something like a checkbox to select the version(s) to remove.
You have inactive versions of a flow and you want to clean up the historic flow versions. Something like a checkbox to select the…
1 vote -
load more items
Please stop using "Load more items..." as the way to load more table items. It's very annoying to have to say show me the last 30 days but then click the button 20 times to get there.
I'm referring to the Promotion history page but anywhere this concept is used should be ripped out.
1 vote -
Please add support for decomposeCustomLabelsBeta
Salesforce added the option to configure multiple features in the DX Project Configuration file. One of the is breaking down the big CustomLabels file into individual files where we no longer need to deploy the whole file but just a file (label) that has changes in. Please see SFDX Documentation here - https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.sfdx_dev.meta/sfdx_dev/sfdx_dev_ws_config.htm
11 votes -
View webhook pipeline settings and error history even when promoting
When any pipeline is promoting most of the options in the pipeline settings menu are disabled, e.g. 'View Webhook Errors'.
We want to be able to access these features, as we might need to reference a webhook error, and not have to wait until the pipeline is finished promoting. Our team is promoting at least one feature to one pipeline most of the day so we have to wait until after business hours to reliably access this information.
1 vote -
I would like the ability to auto promote updates to inflight feature branches
When using feature branch promotion in pipelines, I often find myself in a scenario where I’ve pulled a new feature through the pipeline to one of my static environments. I then test it, discover something that needs to be changed, make the change in the dev environment, and pull that change through the pipeline again so it reaches the same static environment for retesting.
I would like functionality that enables me to release a new change to that branch from dev and have it automatically promote through all static environments, stopping at the current one where the original pull request…
1 vote -
add preview of archived files and let admin choose fields to show on the related list in Archive Viewer
Please improve Archive Viewer with a preview of the files Archived, like the current document viewer on SF and consider to add more functionalities on the related list shown on Archive Viewer, like choosing fields to show and search bar incorporated.
These functionalities are already available with other Archive apps connected to SF.
Let users select the record to restore directly from the related list in Salesforce.1 vote -
Using Back Promotion for single Environments only and selective PR's only
We normally update our developer orgs with the "update sync" function after the PROD release. However, sometimes we have changes that are build on top of each other but developed by multiple devs and therefore orgs.
In that cases, it would be nice to turn on "back promotion" but only for certain environments where it is needed and not globaly. In addition, being able to selectively create back promotions for PRs would be nice as well.
At the moment, if the feature is activated, Gearset is creating a back promotion for every PR, regardless if it is needed or not.…
1 vote -
Select All PRs for promotion
When promoting PRs from one environment to another in the pipeline, it would be useful to have a "Select All" option
1 vote -
Make pre/post deployment steps conditional on developer sandboxes.
Pre/Post deployment notes can be set to pertains to various static environments but they always apply to sandboxes after a back deploy. This should be conditional-- most of the time I only set them applicable to prod and they aren't applicable to developer sandboxes.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?