Skip to content

Help us improve Gearset

We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.

If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

360 results found

  1. Ability to lockdown access to delete Deployment history

    It'd be nice if there was a way for admins to restrict access for devs/other users when it comes to deleting items from deployment history. The use case here is when a sprint is done and we're promoting changes from QA to UAT, it'd be nice to select all the sprint packages and combine them from deployment history so a user doesn't have to go through each change at a time. Providing full access to everyone opens the possibility for them to delete a package that should've been bundled with other packages on the promotion to UAT.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. Add a search function to the Monitoring > Unit Tests

    Add a search function to the Monitoring > Unit Test page to quickly find a specific Test outcome

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
  3. Exclude LWC Jest files from validation and deployment

    We introduced LWC - Jest tests for our project, which seems to cause validation errors with Gearset.

    As per Salesforce recommendations it is recommended to keep jest tests only locally and in VCS and avoid trying to push them to SF as they would cause validation errors.

    Is there an forward path that allows us to tell Gearset to exclude LWC - Jest files from validation/deployment?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. ci owner

    Allow CI jobs to be reassigned to new owners. Or allow for out of office functionality when CI Owner is out of office.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. Change default sort order of Saved Comparison Pairs to use 'Friendly Name' (or last used sort column)

    The new Saved Comparison Pairs feature is great! However, the page appears to load connections in a seemingly 'random' order on each use.

    Confirmed with Gearset Support the default sort order is by create date of each connection pair. However, if feature is used with multiple connection pairs spanning multiple individual instances this requires manual re-sorting of connections every time page is loaded if you want to view pairs logically by naming convention (e.g. Alpha 1->2, Alpha 2->3, Bravo 1-> 2 , Bravo 2 -> 3 etc.) or something other than system create date.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Include more details in webhook notifications

    It would be great if webhook would include, at least, the same information as email notifications. For example, Unit Testing job notifications via email contains the details about the unit tests that failed; however, webhook notification don't. We wanted to use webhooks to get notifications in MS Teams but without the same details, it's not that useful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Restore/export certain fields on objects

    We (the user) would like to be able to restore data, but only select certain fields to be restored.

    Usecase:
    A business user triggers some automation that modifies a field or specific fields on a large number of records that should not have been modified. In the meantime, other fields may have been modified that were correctly modified. We would want to restore a set of records from a specific backup, but only the specific fields that should not have been modified.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data backup  ·  Admin →
  8. Add "Show selected" button to the Custom Filter editor

    This button needs to be in the type and items columns. This way the developer will see the already selected components and be able to check faster if everything required is selected

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Option to group and show all selected items while creating new custom filters

    Option to group and show all selected items while creating new custom filters

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
  11. Bitbucket pull request add Default Reviewers

    When using the "Create Pull Request" link on the deployment screen, please add the "Default Reviewers" to the BitBucket pull request.

    Currently we have to edit each pull request and add the reviewers manually.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. New Analyzer to prevent endpointURL changes for Outbound Messages in Sandboxes

    A major pain point and blocker to use automated CI jobs is that we cannot include workflow rules because we have outbound messages set up to specific test endpoints per sandbox/environment. As the workflow metadata type allows us no ability to filter by workflow rule name (it's by object), this means we have no option but to manually run the comparison and deployments for each of our sandboxes.

    It'd be great to add a problem analyzer to suggest not changing the endpointURL field on outbound messages when the target is a Sandbox. This way, you can deselect it manually when…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Select the fields to deploy during a data deployment

    Hi we use the data deployment feature is it possible to only select some fields to deploy data from one org to another and not always all the fields on an object.

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Allow "View Errors" in CI Job History page to be opened in a new tab

    It would be great if the button allowed to be opened in a new tab (essentially allow buttons and links to act like regular HTML elements that allow opening in a new tab via Cmd/Ctrl+click or via right click)

    Example right clicking the "View Errors" shows no open to open in a new tab https://d.pr/i/m5CNIG

    Right clicking "View comparison" allows for it https://d.pr/i/WpCfFF

    This is similar to https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/35538631-make-clone-package-openable-in-a-new-tab

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
  16. Rerun Github validation on a PR without a new commit

    When a CI job is set to run on a PR creation, if the source destination is missing something that the deploy requires, it will fail. To solve this, we must go to the source destination, make settings changes, and then make an empty commit to the pull request to re-run the CI.

    It would be nice for there to be a link or button in Gearset to rerun the CI and update the Pull Request that the validation was successful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In the ‘continuous integration dashboard’ in Gearset, for ‘validate pull request’ jobs, there is a ‘run now’ play button to run the job manually. You can therefore update the target and then re-run the PR validation without needing an additional commit.

    To be able to run the ‘validate pull request’ job manually, you need to have permission to run the parent CI job manually (e.g. be the job owner).

  17. Require Jira Ticket Before Validation or Deployment

    We would like the ability to make the "Jira updates" section required (i.e. ticket selected) prior to validation or deployment.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    You can now require team members to link a Jira ticket before manual deployments and validations. 

    Simply, navigate to My Account -> Deployment Settings and enable the 'Require Jira Tickets' option. 

  18. Include a Comparison for a Permission Set Group's Muting Permission Set

    Include a Comparison for a Permission Set Group's Muting Permission Set. Currently, you can deploy a Permission Set and/or a Permission Set Group. However, if that Permission Set Group contains a muting permission set, Gearset doesn't pull the data. Here is a link to the SF guide on the muting permission set: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_meta.meta/api_meta/meta_mutingpermissionset.htm?search_text=muting%20permission%20sets

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. More granular control over CI job schedules

    Currently, a CI job that deploys from a Salesforce Org to another org or source control can only be scheduled to run at 4 hours intervals. Additionally, there is no mechanism of specifying when these jobs will run - instead, the job is scheduled randomly within the first 4 hours it was created and every 4 hours after that point.

    Providing a smaller interval (ex. every 1hr) and/or more granular control over the job execution time seems like a common sense enhancement.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. Add a way to "Save" or "Save As" updated filters when in the Refresh Comparison window (like you can in the Compare and Deploy window)

    When in the Refresh Comparison window, it seems there's no way to "Save" or "Save As" the updated filters. Looks like you can only access that feature via Manage Custom Filters from the Compare and Deploy screen

    Any chance we could get that added? It would be super useful!

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base