Skip to content

Help us improve Gearset

We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.

If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

369 results found

  1. Scratch orgs - Create a new scratch org with more than one package

    During the creation of a scratch org the system doesn't allow the installation of more than one package...so after create a scratch org we need to install manually the remaining packages.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. Add batch size option to data deployment

    It would be great to be able to pick the batch size used when doing data deployments.

    We have to work with some orgs using poorly performing managed packages that are blowing up due to CPU limits.

    We don't have many option, so being able to reduce the batch size, and hence the CPU load would be really useful.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Allow components to be added or removed from an data deployment template

    Currently when a data deployment template is created, there is no way to edit the template after it is saved so that components can be added or removed. It would be helpful if we could modify the components in the template without having to create the template from scratch again.

    21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. Unscramble order of <excludeButtons> tags in Layout metadata

    Page Layouts use the <excludeButtons> element to indicate the presence or absence of standard buttons on a layout.

    But this element appears in an arbitrary order when retrieved. Unlike other metadata which gets canonicalized by sorting alphabetically.

    Gearset could sort these elements to avoid the random order causing random diffs to appear in metadata comparisons when in reality there is no difference.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    When Gearset detects that the only differences in your Layout are the result of reordering, and so there aren't any real differences to show you, it will automatically consider this metadata to be unchanged. As a result, this Layout won't appear in the list of changed metadata and will no longer clutter up your comparison results.

    If there are any material differences in your Layouts, they will still appear in your comparison results as normal. 

    And you'll be able to use the Hide reordering checkbox to filter out any immaterial differences, just as you would for other metadata types.

    More details: https://gearset.com/blog/smarter-salesforce-comparisons-that-hide-reordered-xml/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic_post&utm_content=blog_smarter_salesforce_comparisons

  5. Add support for incoming webhooks

    There's already a way to set up an outgoing webhook after a successful CI job run.

    It'd be nice to have a way for a CI job to have an incoming webhook from another service, such as ElectricFlow (a build platform).

    One use case would be for CI deployments to be dependent on external validation services.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Allow deployments across managed package versions

    Gearset does not allow comparisons or deployments of custom metadata on managed packages if the versions are different. We got ourselves in a situation where a package in the sandbox was a higher beta version that we couldn't upgrade to. This required us to do all the field deployments via changsets.

    Adding a warning for deployments across managed package versions would be ideal as most changes one would deploy wouldn't necessarily cause any issues.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We've added the ability to deploy across managed package versions using the Package Item Version Handling dropdown option within the filter sidebar.

    If you have any feedback on this, please let us know!

  7. Improve Bitbucket Server integration for teams with large number of project/repositories

    ideally... gearset should not be hitting https://adlm.nielsen.com/bitbucket/rest/api/1.0/repos
    first. It should hit https://adlm.nielsen.com/bitbucket/rest/api/1.0/projects to get a list of projects
    then allow the end user to select the project
    then https://adlm.nielsen.com/bitbucket/rest/api/1.0/projects/{projectKey}/repos to get a list of repos on the project the end user selects

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Introduce 'ListView' as an option in 'Metadata filter' tab

    When navigating to the 'Metadata filter' tab to select filters, there are currently 122 options, however 'List View' is not one of them.
    When navigating 'Metadata Types & Components' in Workbench, 'ListView' is described independently, and I have used it previously when deploying via ANT. Therefore I would imagine there is a way to identify List Views independently of 'Custom Objects'.
    This would be a huge help with a Production monitoring job, as I do not mind if List Views are updated by certain users in Production, but currently they are flagged as differences. Basically, I want to ignore them…

    27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →

    This is now released, you will need to update the metadata filter for any jobs set up already to take effect.
    You can now exclude list views as well as other subcomponents of custom object.
    (Note: named items is not populated for subcomponent metadata types.)

  9. Warn user that clicking the "What's New in this version" will navigate away from the page they are on

    The "What's New" toast for changes in Gearset looks like it will be a popup or overlay based on the UI, but when clicked actually navigates away from the current page.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Remember default Bitbucket Server repo

    According to https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/17292778-remember-a-default-github-repo, when one uses GitHub as a git provider, Gearset will remember the last used repo in a comparison.

    However, this is not the case with the Bitbucket Server integration. Every time I do a comparison, I have to select the repository and branch again. With a large number of each, this is very tedious.

    Please remember the last-used repo as a default, and do the same for the last used branch on that repo.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. Stamp Deployment Results with Salesforce Id of the Deployment package for auditabilityq

    When a deployment is successful, the deployment results/report should include the Id of the deployment package from Salesforce. This would create a foolproof audit trail between Gearset deployments and when they went into effect in Salesforce.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. Update CI Job History Exports to include User and DateTime Stamp

    In the CI Job section under the view history button, when selecting the ability to export the changes, Is it possible to include a DateTIme stamp
    and User column for each row change?

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. Update the CI Jobs Page so you can organize, similar to Deployments History page.

    We have a bunch of CI Jobs, and it gets a bit difficult to identify whose job is owned by who just by looking at it.

    Maybe make it similar to the Deployment History tab where I can sort out things by clicking the options above like "Owner" or "Name" and it'll organize it the way the Deployment History tab you guys have in place.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
  14. Allow Updating of Associated Jira Ticket Statuses on Successful Deployment

    With Gearset's current the ability to associate a deployment with Jira tickets, and post updates as comments to the stages of deployments, the ability to choose the status (from what is defined in the status of the Jira Board), upon a SUCCESSFUL deployment, would be incredibly helpful in our environment plans for our projects.

    By being able to select the status to update all tickets to from the Jira board, we could effectively manage our custom stages for different projects.

    22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Include Test Run Details in Deployment Report for Validated packages

    In the Validation deployment flow, there currently isn't a way to view test execution results if they aren't manually exported during the process. Having the ability to view the Validation Deployment report and details in this deployment flow is actually more valuable than the actual deployment report that is generated.
    If we can't have that, it would be nice to be able to continue to export those test run results after deployment as part of the deployment details.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Add "is empty" operator to data deployment filters

    Add the empty operator or allow for '' or an equivalent to be considered a value for filtering while using the data loader, this would allow to use filters like where accountid='' or equivalent

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. Add the open PR feature (Github) to work with BitBucket after a successful commit

    It would be great to add the open PR feature (Github) to work with BitBucket after a successful commit.

    Super helpful for the admin team to close off their feature branches and move onto the next job at hand without having to interact with BitBucket.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Add the ability to export Success and Error logs for Data Deployments

    When I do a deployment it would be useful to download the success and error logs as a csv or excel document

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. All apostrophes unencoded

    All apostrophes and quote are un-encoded within when Gearset commits from org to git and subsequently show up as delta change when comparing later.

    &amp; has been changed to &
    &
    quot; has been changed to "

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bug  ·  Admin →
  20. Compare and Deploy Attachments and Files

    Please add the ability to use the "Compare and Deploy" for Attachments and Files. The ability to migrate PDFs, image files, word docs, and excel spreadsheets would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks!

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

1 2 6 8 10 18 19
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base