Troy Hoshor
My feedback
18 results found
-
6 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
commented
Just tested Data Deploy and this feature would definitely be useful for our organization.
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Thanks for the suggestion.
We have plans to improve the way the diff viewer handles changes and whitespace in the future, though it’s not currently under development.
Thanks,
Jason.An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
commented
Jodie, please chime in on the case I submitted here on the BusinessOwnerUser topic... I had exactly the same issue as you!
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteTroy Hoshor
shared this idea
·
-
47 votes
EDIT:
Gearset now lets you select specific fields in layouts for a deployment.
Here's a quick article on getting started with precision deployments for layouts:
https://docs.gearset.com/en/articles/6407322-getting-started-with-precision-layout-deployments
We are working on adding support for more metadata types such as record types, value sets, Lightning pages and other XML types.
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes0 comments · Help us improve Gearset » Integrations and connections (Jira, source control, DX etc.) · Admin →Troy Hoshor
shared this idea
·
-
52 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
commented
A temporary cache of recent comparisons (and their subsequent configuration) for, say, an hour might be enough for me personally. I predominately use the save draft feature as a precaution if I lose my browser session rather than as an actual draft feature.
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Merging differences between Apex classes and VisualForce pages is difficult to do automatically due to the understanding required by the developer. For differences between two orgs in other object types, Gearset helps you sidestep that with our granular comparison results. This blog post explains more: https://gearset.com/blog/merging-salesforce-metadata
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
commented
Another scenario where this is a problem are things that are commonly shared between features such as Page Layouts. 2 configurators are working on separate changes with fields on on a Contact Page Layout; one finishes their work, the other doesn't. If the person who finishes deploys the Layout before the other is ready, we're now in a situation where we have to rollback or they are both blocked from deployment until both are finished.
It would be great to be able to pick and choose which "chunks" of metadata to include in a Gearset deployment so that you could avoid this scenario. The complete feature would be selected to move forward while the incomplete one would not.
There's no good way to handle this scenario outside of manual release management & human review, so if Gearset added this it'd be a huge help!
-
107 votes
Hello. A large number of commenters requested the ability to carry out value replacements as part of metadata deployments.
Gearset now offers a feature called Environment Variables that lets you do just that!
It works with both manual and CI deployments and lets you target either a Salesforce org or a Git repo of your choice. And, for a number of key metadata types, you can even specify the exact 'field' where the replacement should take place.
If you have any feedback on the Environment Variables feature, please open a new feature request or simply let us know in the in-app chat.
Thank you for upvoting this feature request and we hope that you will find the Environment Variables feature useful.
Blog post: https://gearset.com/blog/environment-variables/
Support doc: https://docs.gearset.com/en/articles/5557015-using-environment-variables-in-gearset
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Thanks for the suggestion Celio.
We think this should be possible to do and are doing some background work into how to manage and display this. More details to come soon.
Thanks,
Jason.Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesTroy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Troy Hoshor
commented
There definitely could benefit to being more pre-validation for Profiles. We've been unable to delete profiles due to dependencies in particular.
Maybe a prompt on that "Warnings/Fixes" screen for potential Profile problems?
Troy Hoshor
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteTroy Hoshor
shared this idea
·
Just tested Data Deploy and this feature would definitely be useful for our organization.