Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
275 results found
-
Bulk resolve merge conflicts
We occasionally run into a situation where there are quite a few files with conflicts to resolve. We almost always are just wanting to accept all changes from the feature (not the environment). This takes an excessive amount of time through the Gearset UI to accept changes in every file. Would it be possible to add a button accepting all changes from feature across the entire PR?
3 votes -
Deployment pipeline view personalization
Currently, the view in continuous integration (deployment pipeline) is sorted by ABC, which is not user friendly when there are many team members. In this case I appear last and I need to find myself in this screen.
I suggest you to either:
1. allow creating personal views per user, so I can see only my dev sandbox, full sandbox and production.
2. change the scroll into a "regular" scroll, and not the current drag scroll4 votes -
Show PR Flow changes in Flow Navigator View
New new Flow Navigator view is really good.
It is such a shame that I am only able to view flow in flow navigator in comparison view (when creating pull request).
I would love to be able to open flow in flow navigator directly from teammates open pull requests. That would really speed up reviewing flow changes cuz reading metadata on VCS is not the clearest thing to do.1 vote -
Ability to Customize Export Items in Comparison
Currently we are able to Export All of our comparisons. It would be a nice addition to have the ability to customize the export. For instance, as the GearSet user, I would like to be able to export specific items. I would also like to be able to include either the "depends on" or the "used by" items in my export as well as the specific items that are used or depended on.
IE:
In my export, I have selected Object A, Object B, Object C, Report 1, Report 2, Report 3, Flow X, Flow Y, Flow Z. In total…1 vote -
Adding Identity Settings to Metadata Deployment
Would be nice, if the Identity Settings can be deployed. Currently, every change on any Identity Settings page has to be done manually in each org.
1 vote -
Allow us to update the Associated Azure DevOps work item on a successful deployment
Currently within the successful deployment page, you can edit the 'Deployment friendly name' and 'Deployment Notes' which is a very handy feature.
However sometimes we would need to also update the associated work item as the wrong one can be mistakenly associated, this would be a very useful feature for us as a way of correcting such mistakes (that are in fairness rare).
1 vote -
Have you all ever thought of putting GPT into this and having AI built release notes?
Have you all ever thought of putting GPT into this and having AI built release notes? Sonar has an AI Data Dictionary which we're trying to hack to use for this purpose, then i realized...HEY...this would be easier to do on the release layer right in gearset. Figured I'd share that I would bet a lot of customers would use that.
An AI that explains the change between the feature branch and the main branch for the releases built would be so nutty on administrative time saved.
1 vote -
Soft delete of deployment History
When a person deletes a deployment history that was successfully deployed, it would be good if that deletion was only a Soft Delete and could be recovered within 90days.
1 vote -
automatic pipeline deployment on successful validation
For Pipeline jobs, provide an optional feature (ability to toggle on/off) where if an Open PR has successfully validated on the target org, then auto deploy to target org. This is useful when propagating changes in downstream jobs. For example, once code review is done, a PR is merged into DEV by pipeline admin, but it should also automatically be merged and deployed into QA if the validation is successful.
5 votes -
Ignore line endings in pipelines conflict resolution
It would be useful if the pipelines conflict resolution tool ignored line endings. As at present if you have one file with LF line endings and another with CRLF it will show the whole file as different, where as that is not the case, it's just line endings. Most other devOps tools work in this way.
There is another idea to ignore whitespace in apex comparisons - but this should also be extended to conflict resolution.
1 vote -
Help users Deploy Sales Cadences between orgs
Sales Engagement for Salesforce allows users to build Sales Cadences. These seem to be record based, so being able to move these between orgs would be great.
1 vote -
Pull Request Branch Filter/restriction
Currently creating a pull request from the "Create pull request Screen" provides the user with a list of all the branches.
The default of this seems to be based on the last location you had selected when you created your branch (This usually ends up being main). As we have a pipeline this is the last place you want anyone being able to create a PR into!
It would be great if we could whitelist/blacklist a bunch of Branch names on this dropdown to stop users accidentally selecting main when creating a PR (for most users this would be one…
2 votes -
Provide deployment options for Mulesoft via Gearset
As Gearset does Salesforce based deployments so well, it would be great to have Mule deployments done through Gearset as well.
3 votes -
Maintain version history for static code analysis rule set.
Need to maintain version history of static code analysis when creating a new set of rule ,who made the change , what was the previous version , what rules were there is previous version etc. Right now we cant even clone to create a new version and upgrade on top of it.
1 vote -
Gearset VS Code Extension
My development team spend their time in VS Code where they can see all their Git information etc. It would be great to have a Gearset plugin to stop them having to switch windows and allow them to have information at their fingertips. This could also encourage more developer use of Gearset.
May display:
- Build status
- Static code analysis issues
- View of pipeline1 vote -
Gearset CPQ deployment to delete target org component if source is deleted
Example in CPQ template you have situation when you need delete from source org component (content, line column etc.)
Now you have to delete this in target org as post deployment task.
Current solution support only new or changed component change.2 votes -
Download Package Option does not include custom fields.
Just wanted to flag that the Download package option would be so much handier if it also included custom fields. Even with custom fields selected in my comparison, the package.xml that I can export only includes the Objects.
1 vote -
Allow multiple connections to the same source control system
Currently you can setup as many salesforce orgs as you would like as a source/target but you do not allow the same with VCS/Source control systems.
For example, I can only tie a single account to a single bit bucket. What if you have muiltiple bitbucket accounts that have different accesses to different repos - there is now way to do this in gearset.
You should expand the source control systems to be just like the salesforce orgs - you can configure and share as many as you would like for the same or different systems.
1 vote -
Incorporate Relationship Graph into metadata deployment
Right now is it not possible to deploy Relationship Graph metadata according to https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_meta.meta/api_meta/meta_relationshipgraphdefinition.htm with Gearset. This metadata is required for the so called Actionable Relationship Center, which is part of Financial Services Cloud. Even though the meta data is available in the Vlocity filter in Gearset, the items we are looking for doesn't fall under that one. If selected, no meta data get retrieved and therefore no deployment happens.
6 votes -
Automatically Defer Sharing Calculations
Salesforce has a feature to "Defer Sharing Calculations" ( https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.security_sharing_defer_sharing_calculations.htm&type=5 )
It would be awesome if Gearset Pipelines could have an option to utilize this, if sharing rules are included in Deployment, defer sharing rules for any validation / deployment, re-enable and recalculate after deployment
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?