Jonathan Keener

My feedback

  1. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonathan Keener commented  · 

    I would love this! It initially shows just those pre-selected but then it loads the entire list. I'd love a way to filter back to having only those included in the deployment pre-selected, as that is the typical use case/starting point when choosing "Specify which tests to run" and then maybe adding an extra couple as needed.

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonathan Keener commented  · 

    Where Gearset handles this better than changesets is that it can "retrieve" metadata but you don't have to deploy it. With a changeset, you don't have this flexibility.

    What I've done is create a custom "Full Profile" filter, that pre-selects all profiles and then all related metadata that could impact these. (For example, Custom Objects, Apex, etc.) I then modify it to include only the Profiles I'm deploying. I then execute the compare.

    When the compare results come up, if they are new profiles, I select them, and if they are updates to existing, I search for "permission" and "visib" to locate the specific profile items related to profile settings and select them for deployment.

    This is a little cumbersome, but does get the bulk of the profile deployed.

    I agree that there is a big opportunity here for a more streamlined process for deploying profiles, since they are relatively unique in that you have to retrieve related metadata to gather proper security around them. I would love to see a process that handles this type of deployment automatically by selecting the profiles and indicating that a "full retrieve" needs to be done. The profiles could then internally be retrieved in separate batches and the extraneous metadata retrieved removed from compare. (Other metadata explicitly selected would stay)

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help us improve Gearset » New feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    If we implemented this and it was only able to search metadata from that point in time onwards, would that be useful or would it be confusing to communicate in the UI?

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener shared this idea  · 
  11. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  13. 83 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonathan Keener commented  · 

    This would be extremely useful when dealing with small errors. A quick fix could be made in the source org to a single item, the item could be refreshed quickly and than the deployment could succeed.

  14. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  17. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help us improve Gearset » New feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  18. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  19. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
  20. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jonathan Keener supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base