Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1251 results found
-
Remove "No Difference" items when commenting on jira tickets
when i connect a jira ticket to a commit, I like the way gearset posts a comment on the jira ticket listing the changed items. what I dont like is the long list of "no difference" items posted on the ticket. It makes the ticket comments super long and annoying to scroll through. can gearset update this to only post the difference metadatas, or at least give us the option to include or exclude
6 votes -
Please add support for decomposeCustomLabelsBeta
Salesforce added the option to configure multiple features in the DX Project Configuration file. One of the is breaking down the big CustomLabels file into individual files where we no longer need to deploy the whole file but just a file (label) that has changes in. Please see SFDX Documentation here - https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.sfdx_dev.meta/sfdx_dev/sfdx_dev_ws_config.htm
11 votes -
Provide the ability to get a deployment report on multiple deployment packages
Instead of having to download the deployment report individually for multiple deployments, I would like to be able to select multiple deployments and download one report that contains a list of all files that were deployed as part of the multiple deployments. It is too cumbersome to manually download a report or .csv for each deployment and then copy/paste the info into one location so that I can get a comprehensive list of all files that were deployed.
9 votes -
Precision Deployments for Flow
Please add Flow for Precision Deployment. The new flow visualization has been really great and it would be very helpful to be able to use precision deployments with them.
18 votes -
Add "Open Branches" Tab to Development Sandbox Environments in Pipeline
The only way to deploy an existing feature branch into a development sandbox is to perform a manual compare and deploy. Previously, we had our developer sandboxes set up as static environments which allowed us to create PRs against them for "re-deploy". This is not possible with the new Development Sandbox format. I suggest another tab be added called "Open Branches" which will allow the developers to select a feature to pull and work on in their development environment. That way we get the benefit of easy compare & deploy instead of having to manually compare and deploy. This will…
4 votes -
It would be great to have a centralized way to view all components and static code analysis results for every commit within a branch.
It would be great to have a centralized view for all components and static code analysis results across every commit within a feature branch. For example, if a developer makes five commits to the same branch, it would be much more efficient to review the components and static code analysis results for the entire branch in one place, rather than checking each commit individually through the deployment history. Additionally, there should be an export option to easily share the results with developers. Thanks
3 votes -
Visibility settings for 'Shared Sandboxes' in the gearset pipeline
Currently, Gearset only supports the binary visibility settings for sandboxes; either the developer could see his/her sandbox or everyone's sandbox. But in the case of a 'Shared Sandbox,' there is no ability to give visibility access only to a specific subset of users in the pipeline.
1 vote -
Add the ability to use attachments (e.g Screenshot) in Pre/Post in GS Pipeline
Adding the screenshots in Pre/Post deployments is very essential to streamline the deployments. Sometimes the steps could be complex and confusing, and if the build team could add the screenshots, then it will help the release team to execute those manual steps without the need to get in touch with the developer.
1 vote -
Please add support for GenAI objects
Backups are currently failing when GenAI metadata objects are selected. Please add support so that we can backup agentforce related metadata.
1 vote -
Allow users to choose their default comparison view
Different types of Gearset user will prefer to analyse comparisons in different ways. Some will definitely prefer the XML view; others will prefer the new simplified views.
I think it would be great if Gearset allowed users to specify their default view and comparisons load with this preference.
4 votes -
Dependency-Aware Deployment Sequencing in Gearset
Currently, deployments in Gearset can fail when interdependent metadata components are deployed simultaneously without respecting their dependencies. For example, deploying a new Lightning page that references a report or dashboard will fail if both are included in the same deployment, as the referenced report or dashboard does not yet exist in the target org.
While the current workaround is to manually split deployments into separate feature branches based on dependencies, a more intuitive approach would be for Gearset to detect these dependencies automatically when multiple related components are included in a deployment. The tool could then offer options to handle…
2 votes -
add the name of the draft deployment somewhere on the comparison view
Allow the user to be able to see the name of a draft deployment somewhere on the screen when in the comparison view. Often times, team member will share links to draft deployments but we have to follow up in order to find the actual name of it.
Since the user is taken to the comparison view when they click on a draft deployment link, the name should be visible somewhere on that comparison view page. Even better if that name can also be copied to clipboard.
2 votes -
Add the ability to put CI jobs into folders
It would be great if we had the ability to put ci jobs into folders. We've accumulated a number of CI jobs. Some of these jobs are no longer in service and we're a bit reluctant to delete them as they may have historical information that we may later want or need. It would be great to be able to put things like this into folders to help reduce clutter and organize our CI jobs page. thanks for your consideration.
5 votes -
Clickable Jira Request within Pipeline Promotion History
I would like the ability within the pipeline promotion history to make the Jira tickets clickable. That way a user could simply click the ticket reference to navigate directly to the request.
1 vote -
Feature Request: API Endpoint & Webhook for Validation Errors
I hope you’re doing well.
I’d like to propose a feature enhancement for Gearset’s API that would greatly improve integration and visibility across systems like Slack, GitHub, and Jira.
Feature Request:
• API Endpoint:
Expose the existing endpoint as part of the Gearset API: https://us.app.gearset.com/api/validation/started/{jobId}/result that returns specific error messages for failed components after a validation attempt.
This would allow us to programmatically retrieve validation outcomes and integrate them into other systems for better tracking and visibility.Webhook Support (Bonus Feature):
Even better, adding webhook functionality to push validation results directly to external systems (e.g., Slack) would streamline our workflow.…1 vote -
Deployment version control of Process Builders
This is for Process Builders. Add a feature to allow users to select which version of the process builder to deploy. Similar to what is available for lightning flows. I realize that Process Builders are going away. However, this feature would be helpful as many orgs sill have to manage them.
1 vote -
jira comment after deployment
Right now gearset posts comments to Jira when validation is completed and PR is merged.
We would like to have comments also when deployment is completed.The current comment "Successfully merged PR #297 from gs-pipeline/SF-23601-preprod into preprod" tells nothing to business users, they are not aware of git, CI/CD and what this message means.
Comment "Deployment to preprod is completed" makes much more sense for them.5 votes -
audit api user friendly interface
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Create user friendly Audit API query process
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Allow to export the data of an object or multiple objects for a specified time period
Through the UI or through an API allow to specify the Object (it can be the API name of it) and a time period e.g. 01/01/2024 to 31/12/2024 and generate an export of all records for that object in a zip with independent CSVs with all the data of that Object.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?