Skip to content

Help us improve Gearset

We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.

If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1417 results found

  1. Automatically detect drift between the org and main git branch

    Currently we can automatically monitor and report on changes made to an org via the Change Monitoring dashboard. This compares an org snapshot to the previous days snapshot.

    However, what would be really useful now we have pipelines enabled is the ability to automatically report on org drift from our Github main branch, using a specified filter (i.e. the same filter as our Pipeline CI Jobs use). This would allow us to track, understand and hopefully reduce the amount of drift that occurs in pipeline-relevant objects, making the pipeline more robust.

    17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Deleted field references doesn't get auto-cleaned up in Layouts and ReportTypes

    If a custom field is deleted, its references in Layouts and ReportTypes are not getting deleted in the environment branches. So each time, developer had to edit all the report types and layouts to remove the deleted field references. Imagine, this being done for hundreds of reportTypes in the system. If this cleanup is automated using Gearset, it would be more helpful for the developers.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Delete feature branch ONLY after production deployment

    The ability to delete feature branches only after merging with master branch (which runs the ci job to deploy to Production). Currently the feature branch will delete if there is no PR attached with it. There are instances where I may want to delete a PR to the 'QA' or 'Release' branch but still want to keep the feature branch. Currently this is not possible.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add spell checker to CI/CD pipeline

    Spell checker helps maintain a high standard of accuracy, ensuring your content is reviewed in initial PR's itself. Just like how we use Clayton code feedback.

    If typos is in customer facing texts in UI (which is can be a big problem in public facing application where large no of users visits.)

    It would be good if spell checker can be added as a policy inside Clayton. So that we can find and fix issues easily.

    Advantages
    * We can also prevent potential PROD P1 errors.
    * Enhanced Code Quality
    * Improved Deployment Efficiency
    * Reduced Technical Debt

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add ability to validate commit messages for deployments

    We require commit messages for deployments, but we actually need to go beyond this and validate the commit message format, checking for things like tagging ticket numbers in commit messages, formatting, etc.

    If the commit message validation fails, deployment should not be allowed.

    Some source control providers (e.g. GitHub) allow server-side pre-receive Git hooks which can perform such commit message validation; however, Bitbucket Cloud does not currently support this and it is unrealistic for us to switch source control at this point in time. Without this feature in Gearset we are unable to enforce formatting requirements on commit messages coming…

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Darkmode option

    It would be really helpful having a dark mode of gearset UI. A big number of devs prefer dark mode over bright mode. Since gearset is a tool mainly used by devs, would be good to give to devs the option to customize their UI.

    20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Option to Export Full Comparison (Including JSON Metadata Differences)

    Currently, when exporting a comparison from Gearset, the CSV includes a list of all items from the comparison. However, the export does not include the JSON data that represents the metadata differences between environments.

    It would be extremely useful to have the option to export the full comparison, including the detailed JSON metadata diff.

    Use case:
    Our team is exploring ways to automatically generate changelogs whenever we make deployments. Being able to export the JSON comparison data would allow us to feed that information into an AI agent to generate a structured, human-readable changelog.

    Proposed enhancement:

    Add an option to…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Auto merge of PRs

    Once the validation process is successfully completed for the respective PR, it would be very helpful to have an option for automatic merge and deployment. This would streamline the release process and reduce manual steps.

    Additionally, it would be great if we could have control at the org level to enable or disable auto merge functionality. This way, teams can decide whether they want to use auto merge based on their workflow preferences or organizational policies.

    Thank you for considering these enhancements!

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Ability to Select and Merge Specific Changes in Lightning Components and Flows

    We are using Gearset to compare and merge changes in Lightning and Aura components, as well as Salesforce Flows. While the tool works well overall, we’ve noticed that it currently lacks the ability to select and move specific changes during a merge. Instead, it requires replacing the entire file, which isn’t ideal in many cases.

    It would be extremely helpful if Gearset could allow selective merging of specific lines or sections—similar to how it works for Apex classes. This feature would greatly improve control and efficiency when working with Flows and Lightning components.

    Thanks for considering this enhancement!

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Conflict Resolution Comments

    It would be great if there were a way to leave notes or comments for each specific action I take or selection I make during conflict resolution in Gearset Pipelines. This would really help other people understand the reasoning and history behind conflict resolution activity for future reference.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Allow for Simplify Differences to be performed on metadata type before showing it as "different"

    Currently, Gearset performs a "Simplify Differences" on Clean data service and
    Connected app before reporting these metadata types as "Changed" in the comparison results.

    There are other metadata types, such as "Custom field" that sometimes show up as "Changed" in comparisons because the internal order of some of the tags are different in a sandbox vs production. Re-deploying these files from one environment to the other does not "fix" these differences. Gearset provides a "Simplify Differences" toggle in the UI that shows there is no effective difference with the file.

    It would be nice to provide a configuration toggle for…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Suggestion for Org Intelligence Enhancement

    Add a dashboard within Org Intelligence that tracks metadata changes. Provide the ability to select a date range and view changes across key metadata types such as Objects, Fields, Validation Rules, Apex, Page Layouts, and more.

    The dashboard should include interactive filtering functionality that allows users to drill down into individual metadata components. It should also allow customization of which metadata types are included and display rollups summarizing changes, deletions, and modifications, along with details on who made each change.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. API to Manage CI Jobs

    I would like an API to manage CI Jobs and Sandbox connections.

    In our current workflow, we create new sandboxes and branches for large initiatives. Along with these, we need to connect the SB in Gearset, build the CI job, run it for the first time, and then tear it down when we're done.

    We would like to be able to automate some of this.

    1. I have a branch and a sandbox
    2. I want to connect that sandbox in Gearset (would be great to do this programatically via api)
    3. create a CI job via api
    4. be able to run the…
    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. View Deployment Summary from Pipelines

    My team develops in siloed dev orgs. Once a feature is complete, we create a PR against an integration environment.

    This triggers a test suite run in the target org and a peer code review. This process works well for Apex. However, admins on our team build automations in Flow, which are nearly impossible to review in GitHub due to the complexity of the XML.

    To address this, we’ve been using Gearset’s Flow Navigator for Flow code reviews. Previously, it only took a couple of clicks to reach the Deployment Summary screen, and the Flow visualization made reviews much easier.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Ability for custom masking on Email fields

    Would love to be able to customize masking on email fields. When I currently mask an email field Gearset will make it something like 3d50b95f686844c6@gearset.invalid and I have no control over customization. I want to retain what the original email was so users can fix it and sent to it, if needed. I just want the email “broken” so it’s not used accidently through automation. Being able to customize the obfuscation would be very useful.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Add the ability to lock down Releases in Pipelines

    My team has a release cutoff of Thursday EOD, we've recently begun exploring scheduling our releases to begin at 5:00 PM on Friday, and we had slight concerns that other coworkers may add items to the release after the cut off since it isn't being manually monitored anymore. I would like to add the ability to prevent additional items from being added to releases in Pipelines after a certain day, perhaps add it to the same section to schedule the release.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Add a button or option to run an ad hoc "Policy preview" for archiving jobs

    When an archiving job is first created, the "Policy Preview" is run. This shows the records that the policy will find and archive, once the job is actually initiated for the first time. After the job is run for the first time, there is no longer an option to run a "preview". It would be helpful to be able to run a preview at any time in order to see what the policy will archive the next time it is run.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. AI PR Descriptions With Custom PR Template

    Using the AI PR descriptions and the 'Summarize changes' features needs to be extended to include the use of PR templates pulled from VCS.

    Currently, you can only use the 'Summarize changes' without using a custom PR template. The AI output is helpful but using any of the suggested content has to be copy and pasted into your PR template. Instead, it would be more useful if the suggested content (##What has changed?specifically) can be injected into the use of an existing PR template.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Allow deploying fixes / linking work to closed Jira tickets without reopening them

    Currently, deploying a fix related to a closed ticket requires reopening it, which triggers unnecessary notifications to the reporter.
    It would be helpful to allow linking or deploying fixes to closed tickets without changing their status, or alternatively make it easier to search and reference closed tickets.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Exclude inactive flows from metadata deployment easily

    We often have flows that are in an org but inactive that we don't want to include in our deployment. It would be nice if we could filter on the inactive status and exclude them - similar would be helpful for other metadata like apex triggers.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 70 71
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base