Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1251 results found
-
Feature Request: API Endpoint & Webhook for Validation Errors
I hope you’re doing well.
I’d like to propose a feature enhancement for Gearset’s API that would greatly improve integration and visibility across systems like Slack, GitHub, and Jira.
Feature Request:
• API Endpoint:
Expose the existing endpoint as part of the Gearset API: https://us.app.gearset.com/api/validation/started/{jobId}/result that returns specific error messages for failed components after a validation attempt.
This would allow us to programmatically retrieve validation outcomes and integrate them into other systems for better tracking and visibility.Webhook Support (Bonus Feature):
Even better, adding webhook functionality to push validation results directly to external systems (e.g., Slack) would streamline our workflow.…1 vote -
Visibility settings for 'Shared Sandboxes' in the gearset pipeline
Currently, Gearset only supports the binary visibility settings for sandboxes; either the developer could see his/her sandbox or everyone's sandbox. But in the case of a 'Shared Sandbox,' there is no ability to give visibility access only to a specific subset of users in the pipeline.
1 vote -
Add the ability to use attachments (e.g Screenshot) in Pre/Post in GS Pipeline
Adding the screenshots in Pre/Post deployments is very essential to streamline the deployments. Sometimes the steps could be complex and confusing, and if the build team could add the screenshots, then it will help the release team to execute those manual steps without the need to get in touch with the developer.
1 vote -
Please add support for GenAI objects
Backups are currently failing when GenAI metadata objects are selected. Please add support so that we can backup agentforce related metadata.
1 vote -
Deployment version control of Process Builders
This is for Process Builders. Add a feature to allow users to select which version of the process builder to deploy. Similar to what is available for lightning flows. I realize that Process Builders are going away. However, this feature would be helpful as many orgs sill have to manage them.
1 vote -
audit api user friendly interface
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Create user friendly Audit API query process
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Dependency-Aware Deployment Sequencing in Gearset
Currently, deployments in Gearset can fail when interdependent metadata components are deployed simultaneously without respecting their dependencies. For example, deploying a new Lightning page that references a report or dashboard will fail if both are included in the same deployment, as the referenced report or dashboard does not yet exist in the target org.
While the current workaround is to manually split deployments into separate feature branches based on dependencies, a more intuitive approach would be for Gearset to detect these dependencies automatically when multiple related components are included in a deployment. The tool could then offer options to handle…
2 votes -
Allow to export the data of an object or multiple objects for a specified time period
Through the UI or through an API allow to specify the Object (it can be the API name of it) and a time period e.g. 01/01/2024 to 31/12/2024 and generate an export of all records for that object in a zip with independent CSVs with all the data of that Object.
1 vote -
Integrate with Continue https://docs.continue.dev/
My org already pays for Continue as an alternate to GitLab Co-Pilot
1 vote -
custom meta data filtering based on its value
Currently Custom Meta data records cannot be filtered based on what value they hold. This is a critical item, as we have several custom meta datatype record that would require to be filtered based on the value of a particular field in the record.
1 vote -
Customize the columns in the Compare and Deploy view, such as replacing 'Changed By' with 'Created By
Currently we cannot modify or customize the columns in the list view. So if I wish to see the records having created by instead of last modified by then there is no direct option available on UI at 'Compare and deploy'. It is really useful to have the choice over choosing the right columns as per the deployment needs.
1 vote -
add the name of the draft deployment somewhere on the comparison view
Allow the user to be able to see the name of a draft deployment somewhere on the screen when in the comparison view. Often times, team member will share links to draft deployments but we have to follow up in order to find the actual name of it.
Since the user is taken to the comparison view when they click on a draft deployment link, the name should be visible somewhere on that comparison view page. Even better if that name can also be copied to clipboard.
2 votes -
Share a deployment with a different team
If I use my Gearset instance to deploy for a client, I wanted to share the deployment history visibility with the client's Gearset team.
1 vote -
Allow for CSV to be extracted data type from completed deployment screen
Allow for CSV to be extracted data type from the completed deployment screen
1 vote -
Remove "No Difference" items when commenting on jira tickets
when i connect a jira ticket to a commit, I like the way gearset posts a comment on the jira ticket listing the changed items. what I dont like is the long list of "no difference" items posted on the ticket. It makes the ticket comments super long and annoying to scroll through. can gearset update this to only post the difference metadatas, or at least give us the option to include or exclude
6 votes -
It would be great to have a centralized way to view all components and static code analysis results for every commit within a branch.
It would be great to have a centralized view for all components and static code analysis results across every commit within a feature branch. For example, if a developer makes five commits to the same branch, it would be much more efficient to review the components and static code analysis results for the entire branch in one place, rather than checking each commit individually through the deployment history. Additionally, there should be an export option to easily share the results with developers. Thanks
3 votes -
ability to clone the 'Deployment Pipeline' and edit the connections as per new project requirement
Every time a new project is kicked off , we need to setup the same pipeline with different org and bitbucket connection, gearset should have ability to clone the complete deployment pipeline so that only connections or branches needs to be updated for quick setup. Also some time the owner of the Deployment pipeline needs to be changed so this feature will give ability to clone the pipeline and disable the old pipeline.
1 vote -
View Locations Not Covered from test results
In the Salesforce's deployment result metadata there is details -> runTestResult -> failures -> code coverage -> Apex Class Name -> locationsNotCovered.
It would be very useful to be able to see the locations not covered of any apex class in the test results section of the UI.1 vote -
Re-introduce last used comparison filter
When I start a comparison, it used to default the filter to the most recently used filter. But now it always shows as "On-Demand Comparison". Can you please restore the previous feature...it's easy to overlook that the correct filter isn't shown and you can waste time doing a comparison against the wrong filter. Adam from your team confirms "Yea that was introduced when we overhauled our comparison tool, you'll need to switch to the filter you want to use each time."
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?