Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1285 results found
-
Problem Analyzer while building the deployment
Surface problems with building the deployment to allow users the correct in the deployment.
1 vote -
Feature that allows users to post Deployment information to custom object in Salesforce
Gearset has feature to allow users to send depolyment information to Jira. Provide the ability to do the same to a custom object in Salesforce.
1 vote -
Please add 'Type' and 'Priority' field from Jira to Reporting API.
In the absence of 'Type' and 'Priority' field from Jira in Reporting API, it become significantly challenging to report on Cange Failure Rate and Mean Time To Resotre and rely on either on the Jira title or description, which is again a heavy lifting in order draw the report.
1 vote -
Add Salesforce Data Cloud sandboxes as an option for deployments
Salesforce Data Cloud sandboxes are now generally available but to promote changes from sandbox to production, the only options are through Data Kit and change sets, CLI, or DevOps Center. Having the option to use GearSet would be helpful so all deployments were managed the same.
3 votes -
Force API update for deployment
Please provide the ability to force API versions for deployments.
Allow the administrator to place an API version in a setting and when a deployment is validated or attempted deploy if the API version is the value or below then do not allow the validation or deployment.
1 vote -
Add the ability to put CI jobs into folders
It would be great if we had the ability to put ci jobs into folders. We've accumulated a number of CI jobs. Some of these jobs are no longer in service and we're a bit reluctant to delete them as they may have historical information that we may later want or need. It would be great to be able to put things like this into folders to help reduce clutter and organize our CI jobs page. thanks for your consideration.
5 votes -
Trigger CI Jobs on Gearset deployments
When setting up a CI Job originating from SFDC, we only have the option to trigger the job based on a time interval. Which makes sense since there are no events to subscribe to in SF for this.
But, I think it'd be helpful to be able to trigger a job to run on the completion of another Gearset deployment. This would be useful for automating the addition of metadata items like fields or layouts into source control, which are less-than-fun to create as xml files.
So rather than running such a job every 1hr, we'd ideally be able to…
1 vote -
Clickable Jira Request within Pipeline Promotion History
I would like the ability within the pipeline promotion history to make the Jira tickets clickable. That way a user could simply click the ticket reference to navigate directly to the request.
1 vote -
Feature Request: API Endpoint & Webhook for Validation Errors
I hope you’re doing well.
I’d like to propose a feature enhancement for Gearset’s API that would greatly improve integration and visibility across systems like Slack, GitHub, and Jira.
Feature Request:
• API Endpoint:
Expose the existing endpoint as part of the Gearset API: https://us.app.gearset.com/api/validation/started/{jobId}/result that returns specific error messages for failed components after a validation attempt.
This would allow us to programmatically retrieve validation outcomes and integrate them into other systems for better tracking and visibility.Webhook Support (Bonus Feature):
Even better, adding webhook functionality to push validation results directly to external systems (e.g., Slack) would streamline our workflow.…1 vote -
enable using a Repository Access Token instead of a Service Account
I would like to be able to use a repository access token instead of a service account to connect to VC (Bitbucket in my case). https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/repository-access-tokens/
The main benefit for me would be the ability to conveniently authenticate while maintaining a high level of security, even in situations where corporate change management policies and SSO requirements can be cumbersome.
3 votes -
Deployment version control of Process Builders
This is for Process Builders. Add a feature to allow users to select which version of the process builder to deploy. Similar to what is available for lightning flows. I realize that Process Builders are going away. However, this feature would be helpful as many orgs sill have to manage them.
1 vote -
jira comment after deployment
Right now gearset posts comments to Jira when validation is completed and PR is merged.
We would like to have comments also when deployment is completed.The current comment "Successfully merged PR #297 from gs-pipeline/SF-23601-preprod into preprod" tells nothing to business users, they are not aware of git, CI/CD and what this message means.
Comment "Deployment to preprod is completed" makes much more sense for them.5 votes -
audit api user friendly interface
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Create user friendly Audit API query process
The current process for finding deployments that included a specific component requires multiple steps including downloading JSON and working in a spreadsheet. It would be nice to have a UI that allows us to select a time frame and specific component API name and get a filtered list of deployment jobs within the given timeframe that included the given component.
1 vote -
Allow to export the data of an object or multiple objects for a specified time period
Through the UI or through an API allow to specify the Object (it can be the API name of it) and a time period e.g. 01/01/2024 to 31/12/2024 and generate an export of all records for that object in a zip with independent CSVs with all the data of that Object.
1 vote -
Save Problem Analyzer Changes to Deployment Set
When using the Problem Analyzer to identify and fix issues within deployment sets, it's common to add or remove items to address specific problems. Currently, these changes are not automatically saved, which can lead to recurring issues in subsequent analyses.
Suggested Enhancement:
Introduce an option that allows users to save their modifications directly to the existing deployment set or create a copy of the set with these changes. This feature would streamline the problem-solving process and ensure that resolved issues do not reappear in future analyses.Benefits:
Efficiency: Reduce the time spent on re-analyzing and re-fixing recurring issues.
Consistency: Ensure…5 votes -
Integrate with Continue https://docs.continue.dev/
My org already pays for Continue as an alternate to GitLab Co-Pilot
1 vote -
custom meta data filtering based on its value
Currently Custom Meta data records cannot be filtered based on what value they hold. This is a critical item, as we have several custom meta datatype record that would require to be filtered based on the value of a particular field in the record.
1 vote -
Customize the columns in the Compare and Deploy view, such as replacing 'Changed By' with 'Created By
Currently we cannot modify or customize the columns in the list view. So if I wish to see the records having created by instead of last modified by then there is no direct option available on UI at 'Compare and deploy'. It is really useful to have the choice over choosing the right columns as per the deployment needs.
1 vote -
Option to create a CI job only for back propagation
We created some CI jobs for back propagation of changes from Production to other downstream branches and orgs. But these CI jobs also pick up pull requests(from a different pipeline) for forward propagation.
So, basically there is no way currently to create a CI job just for back propagation. It will be good to have a toggle in the CI job to mark it for forward or backward propagation9 votes
- Don't see your idea?