Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1235 results found
-
Ability to return sub-components of a Profile from Source Control
Currently, profiles in source control are stored with everything as it's all stored in a single file (apex class permissions, layout assignments, etc). This is done by Salesforce.
When using the new "delta deploy" or any comparison that doesn't include every possible dependent component (ex. apex, layouts, etc) - you see many "new" or "deleted" items related to the fact that source control returns everything within the profile whereas Salesforce only returns specific permissions based on the retrieved components.
It'd be great if Gearset could replicate this behavior with source control to match Salesforce's behavior, where it'll obviously have to…
2 votes -
Add additional controls to Monitor
Hello Gearset,
We are exploring using the "Monitoring" functionality to audit our Salesforce production metadata changes for our IT Controls. It looked promising until we found out that anyone on the team can edit any monitor job setting, which creates a loophole in the controls that we can't monitor the monitor.
So I'm curious to learn from Gearset whether any of the following can be done/requested:
* Can we limit the Monitor jobs to only be editable by the person who created it?
* Can we show either an audit history or LastModifedBy/LastModifiedTime of the Monitor job?
* If the…4 votes -
Gearset should control the order of deployment for Report Types, Reports and Dashboards
Dashboards require Reports, and Reports require Report Types. Yet when I attempt to deploy a group of components that comprises all of the necessary components, I'm hit with errors that the required components don't exist <yet>. That shouldn't happen. This is going to <artificially> require me to do multiple deployments. :(
3 votes -
Validation Job to validate feature/* branch by scratch org creation
The idea is to validate feature branches in repo. For doing this it's necessary to allow specifying source branch by pattern (like feature/*) in "Add CI validation job" menu. The validation should check whether the code breaks the scratch org creation or not. This is valuable due to fragility of scratch org creation process (sfdx force:source:push).
5 votes -
Ability to cherry pick changes in a file
When comparing changes between a source org and a target org for a given file/metadata component, it will be great to have the ability to choose which change(s) should be promoted from the source org to the target org.
Presently, it's an all-or-nothing scenario i.e. either one deploys all the changes to a given file from source to target or deploys none. As a workaround, we cherry pick changes to a file using VSCode and then deploy to the target org using VSCode –– which is the exception to our "all metadata changes must be deployed through Gearset" policy.
Adding…
5 votes -
Allow export of code coverage results in daily Unit Testing job
It would be great to be able to export the list of unit tests and their respective code coverage in a csv file for further internal processing.
2 votes -
Bash scripting
Add support for bash scripting. This is one of the most powerful features of Jenkins and something that would make a huge difference in Gearset.
5 votes -
Combine validated packages
Hi Team,
Please add checkbox for validated package as same as deployed ones. that way I can combine package even for validated one's and deploy.
9 votes -
Update Metadata Change Monitor Report
When you update the change monitor report metadata filters and include new metadata types, the next monitor report shows all the newly added metadata as "New Items" on the report. Although not a big deal it did cause an alarm for us not realizing it was due to the change we made prior. It would be a "nice to have" feature if either you don't include the newly added metadata types as "New Items" on the initial report or flag them and have a visible cue to indicate the items were a result of newly added metadata items on the…
1 vote -
Connection List Search Feature
Add a Search feature to Connections Page. I have 59 connections at the moment and the only differentiation between them is a suffix at the end of the login. It would be nice to be able to quickly search the list of Connections like a CTRL + F would do.
I often have to scroll the list and compare login usernames.
2 votes -
Allow orgs to be grouped in folders
On the “My Connections” page, I'd love to see an option to add a folder (and sub-folders).
Currently, there are options for "Developer orgs", "Sandbox orgs", "Production orgs", and "Scratch orgs".
If you are running more than one entity, having the sandboxes related to a single entity inside of a folder would be more user-friendly than having multiple dev/sandbox orgs inside the same folder.
For example, if I'm managing deployments for "ABC Company", "XYZ Company", and "LMNOP Company", and each has multiple sandboxes, it would be really convenient to be able to separate out their various sandboxes more effectively, into…
2 votes -
Force selection of fields to use instead of selecting id as default
In the select related objects page, Gearset selects id as the 'fields to use' field. If we are deploying a large set of data and by mistake do not change the 'fields to use' field then we end up creating duplicate records for Upserts. Would be great if there is an option to enable or disable the default selection.
1 vote -
For failed CI job runs, develop a way update to the job status
When for whatever reason, jobs can get job stuck in status "Deploying".
The real deployment task is already successfully finished in the org, so I would expect that the status of the CI job would be "Succeeded".
I was assured that in 24hrs the status of the job will automatically reset, but can we have also a way to force an update to the CI job manually?
Note: The "Cancel running CI job" button is visible and clickable, but doesn't do anything with this stuck CI job.
1 vote -
SFDX projects and source format and CLI useage
Gearset CI only supports SFDX source that follows the SFDX project template structure (e.g. force-app/main/default/classes and so on). However, SFX CLI doesn't mandate that structure.
SFDX allows you to group metadata by function or logical group (so you can combine metadata in any way that makes sense to you) . We have many projects like this that gearset cannot deploy.2 votes -
Users should be able to specify test classes and save them to draft deployments
Users should be able to specific and save test classes in the comparison stage so they can be saved in draft deployments. Seems like a waste of extra steps to unclick tests and select tests over and over as you work through a deploy.
also when deploys are combined, they would get all the test classes, again, saving lots of time.
6 votes -
CI/CV job archiving
Create a mechanism by which CI and CV jobs can be archived, but not deleted. Sometimes there is a job that is not used, but the history needs to be kept for some period of time.
2 votes -
Global Search feature
It would be very useful to have a Global Search feature within Gearset. This would be used to search the contents of all metadata objects.
My use case is that sometimes a string has been hardcoded inside a function. The only way to find the function that contains the string is to manually trace through the code. The global search would indicate the function that contains this string.
Another benefit would be to track dependencies for metadata objects that don't support dependency tracking. For example Aura Components, we could search for the component name.
11 votes -
Gearset to be added to a connect app
The ability to use Salesforce as an Identity Provider and have gearset be added as a connected app so the user would be forced to sign in with SSO and select when they sign in from salesforce
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Add capability to export components as part of the full deployment history export
It would be good if we were able to export the individual components that were part of a deployment when we export, say, the full deployment history from the past 6 months, or all time.
This would help with IT audits.3 votes
- Don't see your idea?