Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1140 results found
-
Add support for "ServiceCrew" and "ServiceCrewMember"
These two objects are part of the FSL package for Salesforce. Right now, when we do a compare between two orgs, no results with be shown.
1 vote -
While configuring a data deployment, allow save after selecting objects and fields
There's no opportunity to save the data deployment settings after selecting objects and fields, and this can be quite time consuming, so if the job fails due to auth or other issues, right now, this requires the user to start over, and re-select objects and fields.
1 vote -
Provide more detail in Monitoring notifications
Right now, the Monitoring job notifications (Slack especially) provide very little detail as to what actually changed.
Ideally, I'd be able to see right in the message (or in a threaded reply), the first X number of metadata changes made. If there are more than that, then providing a direct link to the detail page in Gearset would be great.
As of now, it simply just says "there were changes", with no detail or way to easily see the changes in Gearset...which is not terribly useful.
4 votes -
More custom monitoring delays
It would be brilliant to be able to choose the days of a week your monitor script runs on so I don't have to deploy changes every single morning and could instead do once a week
1 vote -
to add an option to not to run unit tests validation in CI job in case there are no changes detected
2 votes -
Integration with Rocket Chat
Hello, I need rocket chat integration, in order to receive notifications in deployment group chat about deployment status.
Thank you.
1 vote -
Ability to clone deployments and include non-different (same) metadata items.
I would like to be able to Clone a deployment and include all of the metadata from the cloned package, even if there are no changes in the target org. This way I can incrementally build up a master package that includes all my metadata regardless of where I chose to deploy it.
1 vote -
Filter deployment and comparison reporting by user in the account page
Right now Gearset is showing Total Deployment Team wise . My suggestion is to Publish User Wise Count of Deployments with all Successful , Failed Deployments .
1 vote -
Ability to upload Deployment Checklist instead of manually adding All components
For every release, we have at least 700-1500 or more components to be deployed and adding all those one by one into gearset is a lot of manual effort which might sometimes not be entirely accurate. It would be great if there is an option where we can upload an excel or csv with all the component names and gearset would just create the package for you. It would save a lot of time and effort and reduce manual errors.
11 votes -
Show related reports as dependencies when deploying a Dashboard
When choosing to deploy a dashboard, It would be helpful if all of the reports that are used by that dashboard were shown as dependencies with the option to select them as part of the deployment
1 vote -
Allow Data Deployment to filter lookup fields on fetched data
Currently, when doing a data deployment Gearset will let you know of all the referenced objects from the object you selected. What it doesn't do is the opposite of that - let you know all the objects that reference your object with a lookup.
It'd be great if we could add a filter to utilize some data pulled in a fetch/query during data deployment.
ex. field (TeamMember.ProjectLookup_c in {returned Project results in query in previous step of data deployment).
6 votes -
Make All Items show all items in the filter
On the comparison summary the All Items tab does not show items that don't exist in either org.
It is possible to add an item that does not exist in any org (perhaps by mistyping the name of a class/object/trigger/etc.) but the All Items tab does not show those items. It would be helpful if even items that don't exist in either of the comparison orgs were displayed in the All Items list and flagged as not existing. This will make debugging problems like mistyping names easier to diagnose.
I wasted an hour of my time and that of two…
1 vote -
Download metadata from monitoring job in SFDX format
Please add the opportunity to download the metadata from the monitoring and backup job in SFDX format.
1 vote -
Better error reporting when CI jobs fail.
Better error reporting when CI jobs fail. Many times I open a failed job and there are no errors reported.
6 votes -
Monthly sandbox refresh from production
I would like the ability to refresh a sandbox from production on a scheduled recurring basis on a monthly cycle (ex: from prod to a full sandbox) so as not to overwrite current development items that are in process or testing.
2 votes -
to give an option to take a backup of Filter's data.
As an admin, I share my deployment filter with developers to add new item to filter. As many team members are working on the release , there is a possibility of jeopardizing the filter's data. I wanted to take a back up of the filter's items periodically. How can i do this?
1 vote -
Support user record migration from production to sandbox or scratch orgs
New users are often created in the production org that need to be monitored and brought back to sandboxes as well. It would be great if the data deployment tool could support moving user records from prod to sandboxes or scratch orgs.
11 votes -
Allow Username/Password authentication option when selecting target/source orgs during cloning a deployment package
Currently, when cloning a deployment package or re-deploying a package to a new target, it only works with OAuth authenticated orgs. It would be nice to have more of my available saved orgs to be a target/source when cloning a deployment. I am not able to authenticate a target or source using a My Domain or Username/Password with this method.
1 vote -
Improve CI validations jobs - allow incremental comparisons with Github Pull Request/Push Validations
Currently, the only way to validate a branch, push, or pull request is to essentially have gearset pull all metadata from the repository and the org.
This can result in a long wait time for validation. It'd be great if we could have quicker turnaround for users to get feedback after a push/pull request.
Since github/provider of choice would have the exact metadata that changed in the push/pull request, it'd be helpful to only have gearset pull the metadata that actually changed to limit how much time is spent simply pulling all metadata to make the comparison.
2 votes -
Allow download of the zip package for failed CI jobs
Download the Gearset constructed package from CI job history when the CI job failed
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?