Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1314 results found
-
sfdx repo deployment should be in subcomponents
Context: Compare and Deploy from Org to a Repo.
as i understand it, even if my repo is in SFDX format (Object subcomponents), Gearset still does the compare in the metadata format.
it reads the components from sfdx, combines into a .object form, and then applies the changes to the .object file and then decomposes again.this is causing unintentional changes to be part of our PR
2 votes -
Enhance Metadata Filter Type Recognition
Our team has struggled learning the Metadata API names of metadata types when compared to what items are called in change sets. One example would be to highlight Weblink when a user searches for Button.
3 votes -
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable)
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable) so that there is a way to store it i.e. in Git and see how various jobs, cicd pipelines, monitoring and schedulers are configured which is an enterprise way to implement solutions nowadays (PaaS, IaaS etc..)
2 votes -
Allow serial deployment instead of parallel
When executing a data deployment, an 'Unable to lock row' error can occur if multiple transactions try to lock the same record in Salesforce.
Because the batches are executed parallel, the chances of getting this error high, depending on the situation.
For example the master record in a master:detail relationship will always get locked when a DML is executed on the child record.
If two batches are executed at the same time and they both have at least 1 record that references the same parent, then a locking error will occur.6 votes -
Offer option to auto-limit items in clone comparison
When a deployment is completed, you have an option to clone that package. For many of my deployments, I want to push a package to source control, and then on to production. The second comparison could be limited to just the items in the cloned package. Would be great to have an option to limit second comparison to only the meta-data items in the clone. Would allow subsequent comparisons to run much more quickly, if the user is confident that the package has everything needed for that specific deployment.
1 vote -
Option to ignore package namespaces differences in Apex classes
Our Apex Classes reference multiple managed packages that are updated automatically in our sandbox/production environments. This causes many classes to get picked up unnecessarily in our comparisons/CI deployments between source control (where the managed packages are not committed) and org.
Unlike https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/43917792-add-an-option-to-ignore-package-version-difference this is specifically for different package namespaces between the source and target.
In this example the source has one namespace and the target has 2 package namespaces.
It would be very useful to be able to choose to ignore all package differences in comparisons and CI jobs as a team-wide setting.
1 vote -
Offer the ability to set the ignorewarnings flag on an individual "Compare and Deploy" basis.
Would like to see the ability to set the IgnoreWarnings as an override for an individual Compare and deploy, in addition to at the global level. Occasionally, we will do a community deploy, for example, that returns a warning about a page that includes a Dashboard component, with the warning that the Dashboard ID or the Filter ID might not exist in the target environment. Once we see those errors in the validation results, it would be convenient to rerun the deploy, and ignore those warnings. Possibly similar to how the Test execution options are set on the Deploy button…
3 votes -
Apply certain PA outputs back to the comparison as a "quick fix"
The main example where I have wished for this pretty strongly is the "missing permissions" PA. This is the one that warns "not all permissions are included in the deployment". It would be useful to be able to go from that PA to a view where one could either add all the missing permissions in one go, or do so selectively by profile or permission set. Right now one has to screen scrape the output, paste it into a text file, go back into the comparison and laboriously hunt through the comparison to find the missing nodes, then add them.
1 vote -
Change the Metadata Filters and make them first class
I would like to see a change to the metadata filtering in general.
Filter management has become a important part of our devops process as we seek to lower our comparison timing.
Instead of having it at the bottom corner of the compare screen, move that section to the middle of the compare screen.
In addition, add a side bar specifically for filters that allows you to edit or delete them as well as change the sharing between personal and team. I have example screenshots for suggested layout changes here: https://faef.box.com/s/frse8jnvqsxbl8ue05x641j3wlga1quy6 votes -
Granular "difference types to deploy" on a metadata level
In the CI job, we would like to have the ability to specify on a metadata level if we want to deploy new items, update items and delete items. There are examples of metadata where we always want to delete and others where we don't want to.
2 votes -
Create new branch using type-forward / auto-complete from JIRA (or other supported tool)
It would be great if you have JIRA connected, to make it easier to create your branch. So basically type-forward (-ish) functionality to identify a JIRA ticket and take the issue ID and description as branch name.
Say your JIRA ticket is ISSUE-1234 Implement this awesome feature.
The default branch name would be issue-1234-implement-this-awesome-feature.
(Where it reads JIRA could be Azure or any other support tool of course).
1 vote -
Include code coverage in deployment report
Hi,
I want to use the deployment report to monitor your progress towards improving the quality of our code.
So I need code coverage to be included in this report.7 votes -
Prevent Accidental Backing Out of Deployment components when Deploying Multiple Packages
Sometimes I have multiple packages that have been validated, that I am looking to deploy. If they happen to overlap components, then deploying in the wrong order could back out a change made by the earlier deployment.
From this I came up with two ideas that could help:1) The ability to select multiple validated packages or draft deployments, and click a button that will tell me if they have overlapping components. That will let me know if I have anything to worry about; if they overlap then maybe I should combine them into one package.
2) The ability to…
1 vote -
Option to ignore: <personAccountDefault> in XML
When comparing XML for RecordType permissions in Profiles, some Sandboxes return:
<personAccountDefault>true</personAccountDefault>As part of the XML, even though person accounts are not enabled, this makes comparing annoying.
It would be nice to have an option to ignore this.
10 votes -
Select All Option in Deployment history
It would be nice if we have the select all option in the deployment history to select multiple packages to combine in one go and deploy as one package into target.
2 votesThis is now possible as long as a filter is applied to the deployment history page.
-
The ability to deploy only certain fields in a record type and not all fields
If we want to promote a change to a single field in a record type, we're unable to because the file is pushed in it's entirety. We'd like the ability to view from list of available changes in a record type by field and select just the changes to the fields we want to promote.
3 votes -
resize column widths on "deployment history" page (no truncated values)
On the deployment history page, the column widths are fixed. If you have a value in the "friendly name" column that's over a certain character count, it gets truncated automatically. there is a tool tip to see the full value by hovering, but if you use consistent naming standards for naming deployment packages, this can result in having to hover over many package (i.e. rows) to find the one you want.
if making the column width customizable isn't possible, then making the "friendly name" column character limit longer would be a good start!
3 votes -
Rename the Name bar in compare and deploy to : Name (api)
Simple to implement, just a string rename...
Rename the Name bar in compare and deploy to : Name (api)
It would show clearly that the name displayed there is the API name, not the "label" name XD
Cheerio2 votes -
Allow masking of State and Country to recognize API values
If the State and Country lists have been updated so the API values are set to ISO country codes the Masking of those fields during a data deployment does not work.
Data Load errors: '"FIELDINTEGRITYEXCEPTION:There's a problem with this country, even though it may appear correct. Please select a country/territory from the list of valid countries.: Billing Country:BillingCountry --"'Disabling masking works around the issue.
It would be great if the application could check the State/Country list and utilize the API values for masking.1 vote -
Store List of Objects Downloaded in Data Download History
Given that the actual download files for Data Download expire after a short amount of time (which is completely logical), it would be beneficial to be able to know what objects were included in the data downloaded, and potentially any filters used.
The main reason behind this is from a security stand point, if an employee with access were to go rouge and decide to download sensitive data to sell/take with them, there is no way of telling what kind of data they may have if you were to miss the window of the backup being available.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?