Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1301 results found
-
Control in which country data backups are stored or alternatively export backups automatically..
We require the ability to control where our data is stored. At the moment we need our Swiss backup data to be stored on Swiss servers. If this isn't possible it would be great if we can automatically export data via an API endpoint to our Swiss server.
1 vote -
Add the ability to restrict the Jira Projects Gearset can access
A Jira account may be linked to many projects which will never be interacted with through Gearset. However those projects might still be legitimate for the user, so they can change their project access on the Jira side. It would be great if we could select projects in the connection that we want to choose from when associating to a Jira item.
1 vote -
To be able to filter within a dropdown
https://ej2.syncfusion.com/vue/documentation/drop-down-list/filtering/
Much like the above, when searching through many fields it can be tedious1 vote -
Ability to merge the pull request from inside gearset. It gives me option to stay in one tool and carry out all my opertions.
In Gearset we have option to raise the pull request but we cant approve merge them inside gearset. There should be a checkbox which if checked should go and merge that pull request. That will allow the user to stay in one screen/one tool i.e. gearset. If someone wants to keep its approval processes in bitbucket then checkbox will allow them to only raise pull request and not auto merge/approve.
4 votes -
Manage multiple Gearset teams from a single Gearset account
I want to be able to manage multiple Gearset teams from a single Gearset account, and not have to log out and log in again.
17 votes -
Load Balancer for CI validation
would be nice to have possibility to configure 1 source (git branch), but multiple targets (sandbox), so gearset would have some "load balancer", which would distribute the validations into sandboxes, which are not busy. Its taking too much time from developers to wait for their validations to finish.
4 votes -
Deploy on pull request creation
Currently is supported only validation on pull request creation. It would be great if we can also do deployment on pull request creation, not only on merge.
2 votes -
Show associated JIRA ticket in Validated Packages & Deployment History and Export
We would like to view the associated JIRA in both the Validated Packages and Deployed History pages. In addition, we would like to export the associated JIRA tickets in the Export History Excel report, found in the Deployment History page.
We link our Jira stories to our Production deployments and we would need a way to report on which ticket is linked to which deployment. Currently this is only available if users are diligent enough to also write the story number in the Friendly Name or Notes.
This would be an extremely useful feature especially for companies undergoing SOX Compliance…
3 votes -
Remember last used repository and branch for Azure DevOps integration
Remember the last used repository and branch in all places.
2 votes -
Don't change the first 2 rows of a metadata file in version control
Usually a Metadata file retrieved from Salesforce starts like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PermissionSet xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">So two lines, first with the version and encoding UTF-8 and second with the type of metadata.
Now when GearSet does the deployment to version control, either from an Org or a Branch it uses this styling of the first row:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><PermissionSet xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
So everything on one line, with the encoding in lower case.
I don't see a logical reason this should be different in the files and is then causing differences in the version control system.
Thanks for looking into this.6 votes -
Throw Error When Invalid Test is Entered
When entering test class names in the text field, invalid entries can be added without any indication that there is something wrong, which would lead to uncovered code and most likely a failed deployment. For example, entering in ThisIsAnInvalidTestName would not result in any error.
10 votes -
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
Spacing in formulas
This was marked as completed in https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/34690018-preserve-spacing-in-formulas but seems to be broken again. Formulas or criteria in WF are deployed without carriage returns, which makes formulas very messy to work with.
2 votes -
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered and deploy the components related to that user story.
and once the deployment is done , update the jira ticket status as deployment done.2 votes -
Change Data Capture
When installing a Integration Platform you have to enable the Change Data Capture in order for the platform to receive notifications on changes. At the moment updates under Setup/Integrations/Change Data Capture can not be deployed by Gearset :-(.
1 vote -
add the ability to change columns in the compare results page.
Use Case:
When deploying items from one Org to another I need to filter by newly created items as well as latest modified items. So there is a use case here to add the Created By and Created On columns in the Compare window.Or the ability to add predefined columns into the view.
1 vote -
Add Additional Deployment Preferences for JIRA integration
Currently the Jira Ticket Deployment Preferences don't give you enough options to manage the expected behavior with our process. Right now there is too much noise on our tickets and we want the option to reduce that. For example, we do not need to comment on the ticket when attempting to validate deployment, just as we don't need it for failed deployments (which you already have as a feature). We simply want a comment with the deployment notes when a deployment is made since this would reflect the actual system changes that took place with this feature/issue.
3 votes -
Add a batch size option directly on Data Deployment and Data Templates
Currently we can specify the batch size for bulk data loads on Account level.
With this kind of setup we can't have two pararell jobs running on different batch sizes and we also need to memorize what batch size is required for each of my Data Templates.
It would be nice if we could do that directly on Data Deployment job and even save such setting in a Data Template.
1 vote -
Allow individual lines to be selected for inclusion or exclusion of a deployment
Allow individual lines to be selected for inclusion or exclusion of a deployment
47 votesEDIT:
Gearset now lets you select specific fields in layouts for a deployment.
Here's a quick article on getting started with precision deployments for layouts:
https://docs.gearset.com/en/articles/6407322-getting-started-with-precision-layout-deployments
We are working on adding support for more metadata types such as record types, value sets, Lightning pages and other XML types.
- Don't see your idea?