Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1235 results found
-
Tie scratch org URL to enumerated list of scratch orgs on My Connections
UX suggestion (tie list of scratch orgs to URL)
If you use Gearset to create a scratch org, the list of scratch orgs on the My Connections page does not tie to the visible URL of the scratch org you log into
This gets to be a real issue for the multi-tasker who might have several scratch org tabs open at once but has no way of knowing which one is which vis-a-vis the Gearset enumeration of how the scratch org was logged into the first place. Drilling into the user's name is too clunky
1 vote -
Move the configured regex filters to the top of the scrollable pane (currently at bottom) of
Move the regexes to the top of the pane so one can see they exist and not have to guess that they exist at the bottom of the pane.
Note the example, selects all custom objects - this is useful for ISVs
example: For custom object, there are 100+ entries for standard and custom objects. If you add a regex, it appears at the bottom of the scrollable pane, after all the enumerated objectnames. Coming back into a custom filter, it is not obvious that you had even created a regex as you would have to know to scroll to…
1 vote -
Report Missing Dependencies on Lightning pages
Right now, if you include a lightning page in a deployment and do not include any of the components on the page (list view, report chart, etc), the problem analyzer finds no issue with it.
Even if the report is not in the target or is included in the compare, the analyzer always finds no issue with the lightning page.
It'd be great to have it function like other metadata where it would alert you to missing components in your package (by suggesting to include all referenced list views, reports, etc on the lightning page).
4 votes -
Add a Description field in the General Settings for Automation like Continuous Integration.
We LOVE Gearset. I just took over when an employee on my team moved to a different team. I was looking over the existing Monitoring jobs and had to ask why some of them were setup. They were similar with the exception of when they run, for example. It would be helpful to have a Description field in the General settings section so when someone creates these jobs, they can give a brief description of their intent and purpose. Thanks.
1 vote -
create a compare/deploy function for data similar to metadata
having something like new/different/deleted for data (so we can compare, say, products vs new product options or features) like we do for metadata
5 votes -
Export Object level and OWD (sharing settings) in permissions reports (in addition to the field-level)
Currently, the permission reporting feature only provides field-level permissions export to CSV for all Profiles and Permission Sets. This is a very small part of the overall security and sharing permissions model. Here are a couple of items that I recommend adding to the permission reporting as a starting point:
- Object-level permissions (read/create/edit/delete/view all/modify all) for Profiles and Permission Sets
- Sharing Settings (organization wide defaults) for all objects
In the future, it would be nice to have additional permissions from Profiles and Permission Sets available to export such as:
1. App assignments
2. Tab visibility
3. Apex classes
4. Visualforce…1 vote -
"Next" button on comparison page sometimes does not work
Sometimes, the "Next" button on the comparison page does not work. In the Developer Console I can see a 403 response from "POST https://app.gearset.com/api/static-code-analysis", traced to "raygun.js:2016".
In this case, I have to reload the comparison page.
This happens quite often (I estimate 1 in 5 times).
I don't think that it's a timeout issue (CSRF token or sth.), because just right now I only marked one file in the comparison list and wanted to proceed, and the button didn't work.
On other occasions, I spend a lot more minutes on the comparison page, and the button works perfectly.
…
1 vote -
ability to filter on components
i would like to see the ability to filter deployments based on the components, just like the "Metadata comparison filter:" under Compare and Deploy option
2 votes -
Add an option to not run the comparision part in CI job (sfdx like)
When you are pushing a project with sfdx, there is no compare, sfdx just push the whole package.
It will save a lot of times.
3 votes -
Only see deployment history for Orgs you have access to
We would like to only see Deployment History for the Orgs we have access to. Our clients brought this up as a concern during our deployment meetings.
1 vote -
Ability to carry out action after successful deployment or detect org changes (monitoring)
After every release, we have to do smoke testing. We do have automated testing using selenium and we wanted to trigger the automated testing every after release is detected. It would be nice if in the deployment we can call an api or webservice after successful deployment. Or in the monitoring we can call an api when there's a change happened in the org.
2 votes -
When validation fails, allow option to automatically remove metadata from deployment that was causing failure
It's not convenient when a validation fails, to then download the excel file of the the validation errors, view in separately form Gearset, and then go through the list of metadata I'm trying to deploy and try to uncheck each one that failed the validation. It would be nice if Gearset did that for me.
14 votes -
Yearly report of all previously migrated items.
It would be great to get an end of year report or report of how many migrations were completed and a high-level list of components.
Example:
Custom metadata, lightning components, page layouts, fields, apex, etc.1 vote -
Show Read Only Source control Settings to Members
Would be good to see the current settings of Source control for Members in read only mode.
Currently what greats us is just a text message:
"Only team owners can change these settings."1 vote -
Save draft deployment notes
Save draft deployment notes so when you combine drafts you can see all the notes from each single draft
2 votes -
expand the export comparison option to include the details changed between the objects and not just the object name time and type
expand the export comparison option to include the details changed between the objects and not just the object name time and type
1 vote -
Include the local file name on all the results screens
When you choose a local file to use as compare, on every subsequent screen the only title you see is: "On-disk repository". It would be helpful to include the name of the file.
1 vote -
Include the local file name on all the results screens
When you choose a local file to use as compare, on every subsequent screen the only title you see is: "On-disk repository". It would be helpful to include the name of the file.
1 vote -
Provide ordering for metadata elements when committing to version control
When metadata is retrieved from Salesforce the order of child nodes is not guaranteed and results in false-positive changes when committing to version control. Usually this will be something simple like workflow actions/criteria appearing out-of-order which can be compared manually. However, recently we've noticed entire profiles being committed with every permissions element out-of-order, resulting in a change set with ~20k lines where the actual change is impossible to visualize.
Gearset should provide a feature to 'order' child XML elements alphabetically by name in order to provide consistent commits to version control and eliminate false-positives.
10 votes -
Add Provar integration for testing to support companies that already have investment in Provar.
Integrate Provar for testing.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?