Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1301 results found
-
Support JWT authorization to DevHubs
If Gearset could authorize the DevHub using a JWT (requires DevHub to have a Connected App and Gearset to be given the clientId + server.key + username) ...
Then:
* Scratch orgs created by Gearset could be accessible to any other machine provided that machine is using the sfdx force:auth:jwt:grant command (same clientId, server.key, test.salesforce.com, and username of scratchOrg)
* This is a prerequisite to any outgoing webhook that wants to auth against the CI scratch org
* This is a convenience feature to IDE users who want to auth against a Gearset-created scratch org without having to get a…1 vote -
Migration/Deployment Path
In cases where you have multiple environments, provide an option to define a migration/deployment path; ability to define what environment is the source and what is the target. This will be useful in cases where we have requirement to deploy changes to say production from a specific environment (UAT).
1 vote -
Workflow failed to deploy without error, due to standard object dependency
CI job : Validation shown as success & Deployment shown as success.. but actually no WF deployed. Saying Opportunity object doesn't exist in target just because it was not selected in the components. in a traditional deployments object is not needed to deploy WF, that too standard object. I feel it is a gap.
1 vote -
Link Static Analysis results to the code
Could we link the file names in the static analysis results to the actual code from the comparison/monitoring job?
i.e. Where the results have a list of issues per Apex class, I'd like the class name to be a link to the code for that class
Having a quick peek at the code from within Gearset can help me to diagnose whether it's a genuine problem, or something where the static analysis rules need tweaking.
If it's just the rules that need tweaking, it would be nice to be able to complete that job entirely within Gearset.
1 vote -
Suppress the <deprecated> tag in CustomObject, CustomField
When retrieving metadata from 1GP packaging orgs, the <deprecated> tag appears in the source and, if you deploy to VCS, is preserved. But if you subsequently deploy to a scratch org, and back to VCS, the deprecated tag no longer appears in the scratch org and thus shows up as a diff in the Difference Viewer - confusing the user.
Doc says this tag is reserved for future use and until such time as it is used, suppress
1 vote -
Allow setting the default testing method for deployments
I want to enforce that any deployment into a UAT sandbox runs all the tests. The standard Default option runs no tests since it's a sandbox. I have to manually choose the "Run Only my Tests" Option every time I deploy to that sandbox. I would like to be able to have that option selected by default
2 votes -
Add ability to customize CI Dashboard
We have a number of different teams using Gearset with a number of different CI jobs. I don't care to see their jobs in my dashboard and they don't care to see my jobs on their dashboard. It would be great to be able to customize my dashboard so that I only see the jobs I'm interested in. Maybe it's some sort of flag on job to be able to add/remove from dashboard or maybe its a separate tab called 'My CI Jobs Dashboard' that we could default to when opening CI Jobs. Thanks for your consideration.
3 votes -
Tie scratch org URL to enumerated list of scratch orgs on My Connections
UX suggestion (tie list of scratch orgs to URL)
If you use Gearset to create a scratch org, the list of scratch orgs on the My Connections page does not tie to the visible URL of the scratch org you log into
This gets to be a real issue for the multi-tasker who might have several scratch org tabs open at once but has no way of knowing which one is which vis-a-vis the Gearset enumeration of how the scratch org was logged into the first place. Drilling into the user's name is too clunky
1 vote -
Move the configured regex filters to the top of the scrollable pane (currently at bottom) of
Move the regexes to the top of the pane so one can see they exist and not have to guess that they exist at the bottom of the pane.
Note the example, selects all custom objects - this is useful for ISVs
example: For custom object, there are 100+ entries for standard and custom objects. If you add a regex, it appears at the bottom of the scrollable pane, after all the enumerated objectnames. Coming back into a custom filter, it is not obvious that you had even created a regex as you would have to know to scroll to…
1 vote -
Report Missing Dependencies on Lightning pages
Right now, if you include a lightning page in a deployment and do not include any of the components on the page (list view, report chart, etc), the problem analyzer finds no issue with it.
Even if the report is not in the target or is included in the compare, the analyzer always finds no issue with the lightning page.
It'd be great to have it function like other metadata where it would alert you to missing components in your package (by suggesting to include all referenced list views, reports, etc on the lightning page).
4 votes -
When Field is Deleted Permission Set changes are not recognized for the Field
Let's say we have only one object in the system. Addressc. And we have one Permission Set -> "System Administrator" with only "FieldPermissions" for all fields in the "Addressc" object.
Now I wish to Remove 2 Fields from "FieldPermissions" of the "System Administrator" Permission Set.
1st Field I'm removing just because I do not want the permission to be in the Permission set
2d Field I'm Removing from Permission Set, as I have physically deleted the Field.On Compare And Deploy Page I will See Deleted Field and I will see only one Section to be removed from…
9 votes -
Add a Description field in the General Settings for Automation like Continuous Integration.
We LOVE Gearset. I just took over when an employee on my team moved to a different team. I was looking over the existing Monitoring jobs and had to ask why some of them were setup. They were similar with the exception of when they run, for example. It would be helpful to have a Description field in the General settings section so when someone creates these jobs, they can give a brief description of their intent and purpose. Thanks.
1 vote -
create a compare/deploy function for data similar to metadata
having something like new/different/deleted for data (so we can compare, say, products vs new product options or features) like we do for metadata
5 votes -
Export Object level and OWD (sharing settings) in permissions reports (in addition to the field-level)
Currently, the permission reporting feature only provides field-level permissions export to CSV for all Profiles and Permission Sets. This is a very small part of the overall security and sharing permissions model. Here are a couple of items that I recommend adding to the permission reporting as a starting point:
- Object-level permissions (read/create/edit/delete/view all/modify all) for Profiles and Permission Sets
- Sharing Settings (organization wide defaults) for all objects
In the future, it would be nice to have additional permissions from Profiles and Permission Sets available to export such as:
1. App assignments
2. Tab visibility
3. Apex classes
4. Visualforce…1 vote -
"Next" button on comparison page sometimes does not work
Sometimes, the "Next" button on the comparison page does not work. In the Developer Console I can see a 403 response from "POST https://app.gearset.com/api/static-code-analysis", traced to "raygun.js:2016".
In this case, I have to reload the comparison page.
This happens quite often (I estimate 1 in 5 times).
I don't think that it's a timeout issue (CSRF token or sth.), because just right now I only marked one file in the comparison list and wanted to proceed, and the button didn't work.
On other occasions, I spend a lot more minutes on the comparison page, and the button works perfectly.
…
1 vote -
ability to filter on components
i would like to see the ability to filter deployments based on the components, just like the "Metadata comparison filter:" under Compare and Deploy option
2 votes -
Add an option to not run the comparision part in CI job (sfdx like)
When you are pushing a project with sfdx, there is no compare, sfdx just push the whole package.
It will save a lot of times.
3 votes -
Only see deployment history for Orgs you have access to
We would like to only see Deployment History for the Orgs we have access to. Our clients brought this up as a concern during our deployment meetings.
1 vote -
Ability to carry out action after successful deployment or detect org changes (monitoring)
After every release, we have to do smoke testing. We do have automated testing using selenium and we wanted to trigger the automated testing every after release is detected. It would be nice if in the deployment we can call an api or webservice after successful deployment. Or in the monitoring we can call an api when there's a change happened in the org.
2 votes -
When validation fails, allow option to automatically remove metadata from deployment that was causing failure
It's not convenient when a validation fails, to then download the excel file of the the validation errors, view in separately form Gearset, and then go through the list of metadata I'm trying to deploy and try to uncheck each one that failed the validation. It would be nice if Gearset did that for me.
14 votes
- Don't see your idea?