Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1494 results found
-
Show Auto resolved conflicts
When in the conflict resolution screen it would be nice to quickly see all files that have been auto resolved. Maybe with a icon of some sort on the left hand side next to the circle icon for resolved or not resolved.
1 vote -
In a data deploy, allow filtering data by previously deployed parent objects.
For example, instead of "Only deploy Opportunity records that are children of the Account.Opportunities records that are being deployed" which filters opportunities by the accounts in the same deploy. You would have two deploys. The first would deploy accounts. The second would filter opportunities by those accounts already in the target org.
This would allow you to modularize deploys. You might want to mix and match subsets of data for specific projects. It would allow working around some of the shortcomings of the account hierarchy gearset magic. If there were transient errors (like exclusive locks) you could repeat a smaller…
3 votes -
Update assignee for jira tickets
According to our team flow once feature is deployed to UAT environment, linked task in Jira must be reassigned to QA team lead to start testing.
Right now this is completely manual process.
It would be nice if we can specify assignee in gearset pipeline settings.2 votes -
Provide ability to link ADO ticket after a package has been validated
It would be great to be able to attach/link ADO ticket after a package has been validated. Currently we can only do it before click the validate button
1 vote -
Create a queueing system for the new sandbox updates process
The new sandbox updates process, replacing long lived branches and back propagation in Gearset, is a really nice feature. However, it has limitations. I have found when trying to update multiple sandboxes at once using the updates feature, Gearset can only handle a couple before throwing an error and saying it is too busy and to try again later.
I have 6 sandboxes in the pipeline all using this feature so I have to start two, wait for them to update and then start the next two and so on.
If there was a way to set up a queueing…
1 vote -
Update Jira Status when linking to a ticket in Gearset
When a Jira ticket is linked to a branch in Github through Gearset, the status of the ticket could be automated (For example, we have statuses of In Development or Ready for Pipeline which could be used) to match further with the automatic status changes when the feature deploys through the pipeline.
1 vote -
Permission set changes not displaying without drilling down
You shouldn't have to drill in to see the changes in a permission set. I was stumped b/c it showed no difference, but in reality I had to drill down to see the difference. This is bad UI
10 votes -
Include CPQ Favorite objects in the supported objects
CPQ includes Favorite objects as part of the package but Gearset doesn't support them. These can be shared proactively with users so they don't have to make their own Favorites. We make these in a sandbox along with new CPQ product configurations and would like to be able to push these up to production along with the new configs.
1 vote -
Filter metadata types based on whether org is licensed for that metadata or user permissions for that metadata
Compare 2.0 Metadata types
Why am I seeing Fuel Type and Fuel Type Sustainability Unit of Measure ? Running user needs a special permission set to see these metadata types and I, as running user in Gearset, don’t have this permission set.
This is an example of a general suggestion wherein if the source org/running user isn’t licensed/permissioned for some SFDC metadata, it shouldn’t appear in the (lengthy) enumeration of metadata types
Other examples are Live Chat XXX, PaymentGatewayProvider, SchedulingXXX,SustainabilityUom,SustnUomConversion, WebStoreXXX and many more
2 votes -
Add support for Vlocity managed package vlocity_cmt__ProductConfigurationProcedure__c object
Add support for Vlocity managed package vlocity cmt ProductConfigurationProcedure c object. Currently it is not supported by Gearset Vlocity tab. Confirmed by Gearset. This limits the autonomy of products deployment for Vlocity projects.
5 votes -
Deploy the Name of object without truncating
Hello,
I deploy from Sandbox to Prod.
I have a custom object where the Name is 42 characters long on the Sandbox.
When I deploy, it has only 40 characters on Prod.
If I run compare, 42 on sandbox, 40 on Prod.
If I deploy again, still 40 on Prod.
I can of course change the Name by hand on Prod to 42 characters.
Thanks
Stephane1 vote -
Team members are able to create release with no access to CI job
Team members are able to create release with no access to CI job.
"Promote changes" is gray as expected, however "Create release" works which is awkward1 vote -
Add the "cloned from" friendly name somewhere on the comparison page.
This suggestion is specific to comparisons that are initiated by cloning a package (that already has been named). Gearset / salesforce takes a bit of time to finish its comparison/validation, so often times I'll open up to 5+ tabs one for each of my gearset deployments. As the comparisons complete, I'll move between the tabs to progress through the steps, but as you can imagine it gets confusing which compare is cloned from which deployment.
Possible ways to display on UI:
When cloning a single package -
e.g.
Apps-87431When multiple packages are combined -
e.g.
Apps-87431
Apps-87431-Step2
Apps-87431-AddFieldUsually,…
2 votes -
Grouping developer sandboxes in Pipelines - back-promotion to a group
Team,
Currently Gearset Pipelines only offers the option to connect a developer sandbox group to a single downstream environment. While back-promotion to a group isn't available yetCould you please enable it ?
3 votes -
Implement a Ticketing Feature
Salesforce DevOps Center has a useful feature that allows users to create different Projects that have their own pipelines. Within each Project, you can create Work Items (similar to Issues in Jira). The user can then perform their work in a Salesforce environment and then run a comparison to associate certain changes to respective Work Items.
From there, each Work Item can be promoted through the various environments in the Project pipeline.
This is really helpful when working on numerous tickets/features for a given project, knowing exactly which environment each Work Item is in and the various metadata elements that…
4 votes -
Display auto-merged files during Conflict Resolution
The Conflict Resolution only displays files that require manual resolution. Sometimes I want to see the files that were automatically merged without human intervention.
The only way to see this is to submit a resolution as is, then read through the file changes again to look for files that were auto merged/resolved from target instead of source.
2 votes -
Allow users to select a default comparison view between 'Permissions View' and 'XML view'.
During comparisons, I constantly have to select the XML view when I click through rows of metadata as it keeps defaulting back to the Permissions View, I don't particularly find the permissions view that useful and I'm also used to XML views, would appreciate if you could give users a choice in a 'default' view to improve experience.
2 votes -
Automatic analysis for metadata
Adopt automatic validation for API names of custom objects, custom fields, custom settings, and custom metadata types. Additionally, ensure that the "Description" field is populated to enforce documentation by administrators and developers on Salesforce metadata, including custom fields, custom objects, automation (Approval Processes, Flows, Entitlement Processes), and other applicable metadata types.
2 votes -
new comparison tool issues
new comparison method/view has a few bugs/bad ideas
when selecting a comparison pair & comparison filter on the "saved comparison pairs" page, the chosen filter does not carry through to the new screen & has to be re-applied
once in the comparison screen, there is no "sele3cted" button like on the legacy page. - this is crucial to know where I'm up to with selecting the parts to release.
2 votes -
Improve visualization of multiple features being simultaneously worked on in a single developer sandbox.
Currently, one must select (or create) a single feature+branch in the developer sandbox. The pipeline view only shows 1 active feature at a time. It would be nice visually see all of the features an individual developer is working on/assigned to.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?