Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1380 results found
-
Microsoft Active Directory authentication for Gearset
Our company works with Microsoft tools and it would be very useful for us to be able to authenticate with Microsoft Active Directory. That way our security team only has 1 place to manage users for all our tools.
4 votes -
Deploying from SF to Repo with unlocked packages can result in items deploying incorrectly
When deploying from SF to a branch that has the force-app and unlocked packages, if you deploy an item that would include the object file it deploys to the unlocked package directory instead of the default app listed in the project.json. The end result is everything related to the object is moved from the force-app to the unlocked package directory.
Steps to recreate:
Enable source tracked sandboxes
Create a new dev sandbox
Create a new branch and link it to the new sandbox
Create a new field on Contact
Edit a search layout on Contact
Use gearset to deploy the…1 vote -
Allow users to share deployment drafts across different Gearset environment
Lets say multiple vendors are working on different environments and done the deployment across all the lower environments using their own Gearset. But coming to the production org. internal team will be performing the deployments using internal Gearset. So Instead of recreating the deployment draft again, it would be very useful internal team can reuse the draft created by vendor in different Gearset environment.
1 vote -
Add the concept of Master seeding object
One great feature to have, would be the possibility to identify a Master object from which the filters applied on it would be applied on all dependent objects automatically.
2 votes -
"Dismiss/Hide Item" option for any found comparison
There are numerous "changes' that aren't actually changes (ex: logo images, Global Picklist set order). It'd be great to hide those those changes or dismiss them in a comparison to not look at them. Once it's dismissed, it's out of sight and there is no need to evaluate it every time you look at a saved comparison. It'd be clear that it was evaluated and not dismissed.
1 vote -
Filter option: not containing, eg. rather than filtering for 'custom field', filter by components not a 'custom field'
A better example might be I don't want to see anything that has the word 'contact'.
1 vote -
Ability to differentiate between scheduled metadata deployments from validated packages and non validated packages
Under Deployment History
All scheduled packages should appear. This is not the case today, validated packages that have been scheduled appear under validated packages with a Scheduled Date but not under Deployment History
Scheduled packages should have a link to the appropriate Validated package if any.
1 vote -
create a Default Value setting on Source Control & Connections
Reading the previous suggestions this might be a bug.
Where a user has multiple connections to Github, Bitbucket etc. It would be good to be able to set a default connection.
It is suggested that when you go to Compare, the last selection should be displayed. But I am not seeing that happening?
I would expect the default Source to display, no matter what Compare I and setting.
1 vote -
Allow CI jobs to validate PRs of a branch into Separate Scratch Orgs
Currently CI jobs can only validate PRs into a regular org. So if you have multiple PRs raised to that branch then you have to wait as they each run one after the other. If we could validate into separate Scratch Orgs instead then all the PR validations could run in parallel and it would speed up validation
6 votes -
add an account based autonumber field to deployment that could be used as a friendly reference
This could be automatically prefixed to friendly name of the deployment.
Sth like "000035"
Could be a simple counter (that I see you have implemented "This is your NNth deployment...").
If the autonumber would pop up automatically then I would not need to figure out a reference and type it myself.
Currently, info that potentially could be used: datetime (too long) , url (way too long)
2 votes -
Friendly name should be surfaced on the deployment summary page.
The Friendly Name should be surfaced on the deployment summary page, either as a row in the "Summary" section or in its own section, similar to Deployment Notes.
We often track deployments by saving links to the deployment summary. But there is not an easy way to grab the friendly name if we want to search the deployment report; for example to combine packages.
4 votes -
Run only apex test thats related to the Pull request for Validate pull requests targeting the source branch
When we check Validate pull requests targeting the source branch for the Pull request , it runs all the test class irrespective of the package content that being pushed.
It should not run any test class if pushed metadata is only configuration.
It should run only test class if pushed metadata ha class.1 vote -
Ability to Export SFDC Fields into a CSV File
Would it be possible to get a feature where we can download the fields into a csv file?
1 vote -
Use external script/template for masking data
I would love to be able to use my own script/template when doing just data (not having the compliance option) to select what fields I want to mask and the format for how I want to mask them. I will explain more.
When doing a data deployment (data seeding) to our developer sandboxes, I would like to be able to use an external script/template for masking data. In my script/template would like to be able to set the format for the masking and how much of the value to mask. For instance maybe I want to mask a phone number…
2 votes -
Show data hosting option chosen for an account
It would be great to see the chosen data hosting option for an account in the 'My Account' area. Without it security audits will not be able to verify what setting was chosen and will have to rely on documentation held elsewhere.
1 vote -
Allow exporting of custom filter settings
I have some regexes configured specifically for continuous integration, changing these would likely break our CI process. I would like to be able to export a JSON or YAML (or whatever sensible text based format) of my filter configuration, so I can easily view which metadata I'm selecting and excluding through regex, and possibly commit this file to source control.
This is primarily because our team shares filters, and I'd hate to lose the configuration because of someone mucking up.
3 votes -
Re-validate a deployment after failure without returning to compare
Would love the ability to re-validate a deployment after making changes to the target org. I notice this a lot if there's a username issue that needs fixed in the target, I'm able to fix the issue without refreshing the comparison, but still have to return to the compare, go through the automated fixes, and then re-validate the deployment.
2 votes -
CI Job History - Show what CI runs were manual and who triggered the manual run
It's nice that the CI job history shows the source commit link for the auto triggered deployments from Github merges, but for visibility and transparency it would also be good for users to see when a job was triggered from a manual run and what users ran it.
4 votes -
Bash scripting
Add support for bash scripting. This is one of the most powerful features of Jenkins and something that would make a huge difference in Gearset.
7 votes -
Empty cache during meta deployment process
Before you deploy but after you start the process it should be possible to refresh / empty cache to make sure that any updates to the meta data in either source or target are updated.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?