Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1231 results found
-
Throw Error When Invalid Test is Entered
When entering test class names in the text field, invalid entries can be added without any indication that there is something wrong, which would lead to uncovered code and most likely a failed deployment. For example, entering in ThisIsAnInvalidTestName would not result in any error.
10 votes -
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
Spacing in formulas
This was marked as completed in https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/34690018-preserve-spacing-in-formulas but seems to be broken again. Formulas or criteria in WF are deployed without carriage returns, which makes formulas very messy to work with.
2 votes -
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered and deploy the components related to that user story.
and once the deployment is done , update the jira ticket status as deployment done.2 votes -
Change Data Capture
When installing a Integration Platform you have to enable the Change Data Capture in order for the platform to receive notifications on changes. At the moment updates under Setup/Integrations/Change Data Capture can not be deployed by Gearset :-(.
1 vote -
add the ability to change columns in the compare results page.
Use Case:
When deploying items from one Org to another I need to filter by newly created items as well as latest modified items. So there is a use case here to add the Created By and Created On columns in the Compare window.Or the ability to add predefined columns into the view.
1 vote -
Add Additional Deployment Preferences for JIRA integration
Currently the Jira Ticket Deployment Preferences don't give you enough options to manage the expected behavior with our process. Right now there is too much noise on our tickets and we want the option to reduce that. For example, we do not need to comment on the ticket when attempting to validate deployment, just as we don't need it for failed deployments (which you already have as a feature). We simply want a comment with the deployment notes when a deployment is made since this would reflect the actual system changes that took place with this feature/issue.
3 votes -
Add a batch size option directly on Data Deployment and Data Templates
Currently we can specify the batch size for bulk data loads on Account level.
With this kind of setup we can't have two pararell jobs running on different batch sizes and we also need to memorize what batch size is required for each of my Data Templates.
It would be nice if we could do that directly on Data Deployment job and even save such setting in a Data Template.
1 vote -
Allow individual lines to be selected for inclusion or exclusion of a deployment
Allow individual lines to be selected for inclusion or exclusion of a deployment
46 votesEDIT:
Gearset now lets you select specific fields in layouts for a deployment.
Here's a quick article on getting started with precision deployments for layouts:
https://docs.gearset.com/en/articles/6407322-getting-started-with-precision-layout-deployments
We are working on adding support for more metadata types such as record types, value sets, Lightning pages and other XML types.
-
'Select All' on Draft Deployments and Deployment History
When combining packages it would be very nice if there was a 'Select All' checkbox.
1 vote -
Select source control based on actual setup/connections when starting comparison
When starting a comparison and selecting source/target environments for Source Control - it shows all connection types including those that I haven't connected.
With browser cache, it seems to remember the one you selected last. However, for new users (or when you clear cache) it'd be ideal if Gearset would default your source control on this screen to whatever the user has connected. Once a user has connected a source, there's no sense in having the user choose it again at this step.
3 votes -
Add "Manage Custom Filters" button next to Metadata Comparison Filter dropdown
I find myself always going into the "Manage custom filters" screen as it allows you to see what metadata you're including and even change the selected filter.
To get to that screen always requires a click on the drop down (Metadata Comparison Filter) and then another click at the very top on "Manage Custom Filters".
It'd be great if the "Manage Custom filters" gear/button was displayed on the main UI next to the "Metadata Comparison Filter" to save time (avoid clicking on the dropdown) and allow users to quickly get to the Manage Custom filters screen which contains all you…
4 votes -
Associate pull requests to work items in Azure DevOps
When you create a pull request from gearset, the pull request isn't associated with the Azure DevOps work item.
8 votes -
Jira ticket association should carry over to deployment merges and comparison refreshes
If I clone a deployment, it copies all the associated Jira tickets, but if I merge two deployments, the list of associated Jira tickets is empty. Is that how it is supposed to work? I would expect a union of the lists of all the merged deployments.
The same would apply to comparison refreshes.
1 vote -
WebStoreTemplate
Please add WebStoreTemplate as a metadata type
1 vote -
Jira: Ability to pass a list of Jira ticket Ids vs. single entry
Would really benefit from being able to paste a list of Jira Ids, e.g. comma-delimited (similar to specified tests) on final deployment. Hate giving up validation / deployment status writebacks to Jira, but often we have packages spanning dozens of Jira tickets and entry can be time-consuming, especially if there is a failure or refresh needed and Jira ticket associations get lost from the draft.
1 vote -
The Action Order in the XML should follow the sortOrder
Sometimes there is a difference between a object because the order of the platformActionListItems are different. Sometimes an item with order 0 comes first, but it is possible that an item with 9 comes first. This is probably an error in Salesforce API, but Gearset should order this list before the comparison so 0 will always be the first item.
2 votes -
Monitoring enhancement: compare permissions across users
It would be cool if the Gearset Permissions Explorer would help you in determining how to collapse Profiles into fewer numbers. The model would be https://perm-comparator.herokuapp.com/
A typical org has proliferated Profiles over the years, many only slightly different from one another. As SFDC wants us to move to Permission Sets, job one is to collapse the profiles into as few as possible - this requires comparing user permissions against each other (you can't just compare profiles, you need to know what additional permissions some users have vs others too)
Since SFDC is finally making dynamic Lightning pages GA (for…
1 vote -
Send different deployment notifications based on the target org type
Successful deployment notification is for all sandboxes. It would be nice if we can have a separate notification for production and sandboxes as certain people only care what goes to production. Thank you!
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?