Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1308 results found
-
In a data deploy, allow filtering data by previously deployed parent objects.
For example, instead of "Only deploy Opportunity records that are children of the Account.Opportunities records that are being deployed" which filters opportunities by the accounts in the same deploy. You would have two deploys. The first would deploy accounts. The second would filter opportunities by those accounts already in the target org.
This would allow you to modularize deploys. You might want to mix and match subsets of data for specific projects. It would allow working around some of the shortcomings of the account hierarchy gearset magic. If there were transient errors (like exclusive locks) you could repeat a smaller…
3 votes -
Update assignee for jira tickets
According to our team flow once feature is deployed to UAT environment, linked task in Jira must be reassigned to QA team lead to start testing.
Right now this is completely manual process.
It would be nice if we can specify assignee in gearset pipeline settings.2 votes -
Provide ability to link ADO ticket after a package has been validated
It would be great to be able to attach/link ADO ticket after a package has been validated. Currently we can only do it before click the validate button
1 vote -
Create a queueing system for the new sandbox updates process
The new sandbox updates process, replacing long lived branches and back propagation in Gearset, is a really nice feature. However, it has limitations. I have found when trying to update multiple sandboxes at once using the updates feature, Gearset can only handle a couple before throwing an error and saying it is too busy and to try again later.
I have 6 sandboxes in the pipeline all using this feature so I have to start two, wait for them to update and then start the next two and so on.
If there was a way to set up a queueing…
1 vote -
Update Jira Status when linking to a ticket in Gearset
When a Jira ticket is linked to a branch in Github through Gearset, the status of the ticket could be automated (For example, we have statuses of In Development or Ready for Pipeline which could be used) to match further with the automatic status changes when the feature deploys through the pipeline.
1 vote -
Include CPQ Favorite objects in the supported objects
CPQ includes Favorite objects as part of the package but Gearset doesn't support them. These can be shared proactively with users so they don't have to make their own Favorites. We make these in a sandbox along with new CPQ product configurations and would like to be able to push these up to production along with the new configs.
1 vote -
Filter metadata types based on whether org is licensed for that metadata or user permissions for that metadata
Compare 2.0 Metadata types
Why am I seeing Fuel Type and Fuel Type Sustainability Unit of Measure ? Running user needs a special permission set to see these metadata types and I, as running user in Gearset, don’t have this permission set.
This is an example of a general suggestion wherein if the source org/running user isn’t licensed/permissioned for some SFDC metadata, it shouldn’t appear in the (lengthy) enumeration of metadata types
Other examples are Live Chat XXX, PaymentGatewayProvider, SchedulingXXX,SustainabilityUom,SustnUomConversion, WebStoreXXX and many more
2 votes -
Let "member" create team-shared CI jobs OR let owner convert member's CI job to team-shared
I see currently only team owners are able to create Team-Shared CI jobs. When my offshore team members who have "Member" role need to create a new CI job, their only option is creating a user-owned CI job, thus missing the benefits of Team-Shared CI jobs. All of our org connections are already Team-Shared. And we already have a Team-shared VC connection too. So, it'd have been very helpful if non-owner users with "Member" role could create Team-Shared CI.
Alternatively, if that's not possible, next best thing would be - if team owners could convert any member owned CI job…
1 vote -
Let "member" re-authorize team-shared orgs connections
In our Gearset setup, we have tens of "Team-Shared" orgs, both production and sandbox. Whenever any sandbox gets refreshed, its connection in Gearset needs to be re-authorized.
Currently, only users with "Owner" role have this "Re-Authorize" option. Users with "Member" role don't have this option.
This creates a problem for my team. Since my offshore team is supposed to do these sandbox refresh and re-authorization tasks, and they can't do it unless I give them "Owner" role, and thus giving them admin privilege over the entire Gearset.
Thus, I'm looking for a way to let a non-owner re-authorize salesforce org…
1 vote -
Add support for Vlocity managed package vlocity_cmt__ProductConfigurationProcedure__c object
Add support for Vlocity managed package vlocity cmt ProductConfigurationProcedure c object. Currently it is not supported by Gearset Vlocity tab. Confirmed by Gearset. This limits the autonomy of products deployment for Vlocity projects.
5 votes -
Deploy the Name of object without truncating
Hello,
I deploy from Sandbox to Prod.
I have a custom object where the Name is 42 characters long on the Sandbox.
When I deploy, it has only 40 characters on Prod.
If I run compare, 42 on sandbox, 40 on Prod.
If I deploy again, still 40 on Prod.
I can of course change the Name by hand on Prod to 42 characters.
Thanks
Stephane1 vote -
Add support to deploy Digital Experiences (LWR) using Digital Experience Bundle Components
Similiarly to how you can deploy metadata for non-LWR Digital Experiences (Aura templates), where you can select different metadata changes individually using Experience Bundle Components, rather than deploying all your changes at once, it would be great if that option is available for Digital Experiences running on LWR (Digital Experience Bundle)
1 vote -
Team members are able to create release with no access to CI job
Team members are able to create release with no access to CI job.
"Promote changes" is gray as expected, however "Create release" works which is awkward1 vote -
Add the "cloned from" friendly name somewhere on the comparison page.
This suggestion is specific to comparisons that are initiated by cloning a package (that already has been named). Gearset / salesforce takes a bit of time to finish its comparison/validation, so often times I'll open up to 5+ tabs one for each of my gearset deployments. As the comparisons complete, I'll move between the tabs to progress through the steps, but as you can imagine it gets confusing which compare is cloned from which deployment.
Possible ways to display on UI:
When cloning a single package -
e.g.
Apps-87431When multiple packages are combined -
e.g.
Apps-87431
Apps-87431-Step2
Apps-87431-AddFieldUsually,…
2 votes -
Permission set changes not displaying without drilling down
You shouldn't have to drill in to see the changes in a permission set. I was stumped b/c it showed no difference, but in reality I had to drill down to see the difference. This is bad UI
9 votes -
Increase API call limits
There currently is a API limit of only 10 calls per hour for the reporting and audit API's. This makes it difficult when developing and testing applications that tie into the api. In our case we use the api to pipe the data into our observability platform for reporting and dashboarding. It would be nice to either increase to something not THAT low or to have a development override option of some sort that customers to request to temporary increase. I understand the need for some limits due to having a shared cloud platform but this seems to be on…
3 votes -
Grouping developer sandboxes in Pipelines - back-promotion to a group
Team,
Currently Gearset Pipelines only offers the option to connect a developer sandbox group to a single downstream environment. While back-promotion to a group isn't available yetCould you please enable it ?
3 votes -
Implement a Ticketing Feature
Salesforce DevOps Center has a useful feature that allows users to create different Projects that have their own pipelines. Within each Project, you can create Work Items (similar to Issues in Jira). The user can then perform their work in a Salesforce environment and then run a comparison to associate certain changes to respective Work Items.
From there, each Work Item can be promoted through the various environments in the Project pipeline.
This is really helpful when working on numerous tickets/features for a given project, knowing exactly which environment each Work Item is in and the various metadata elements that…
4 votes -
Display auto-merged files during Conflict Resolution
The Conflict Resolution only displays files that require manual resolution. Sometimes I want to see the files that were automatically merged without human intervention.
The only way to see this is to submit a resolution as is, then read through the file changes again to look for files that were auto merged/resolved from target instead of source.
2 votes -
Allow users to select a default comparison view between 'Permissions View' and 'XML view'.
During comparisons, I constantly have to select the XML view when I click through rows of metadata as it keeps defaulting back to the Permissions View, I don't particularly find the permissions view that useful and I'm also used to XML views, would appreciate if you could give users a choice in a 'default' view to improve experience.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?