Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1307 results found
-
Allow complex filters and child relationships on filters for data loading
Allow complex filters and child relationships on filters for data loading. For example, filter the Account to only load if the Owner is an Active user in the system.
12 votes -
Be able to exclude single items from comparison
E.g. If I generally want to include all Custom fields for all Objects in the comparison, but there’s one specific field that I don’t ever want to send across to the target org, it’ll keep popping up and I’ll have to uncheck it each time.
1 vote -
Track Items Added to Draft Packages
It would be nice to be able to see which items within a comparison are part of Draft Packages. We have a need to build multiple packages from a single Comparison of Instances. This can be done by creating many Drafts, but it is sometimes difficult to know if items have been added to a draft package already. If we could visually see this, it would allow us to generate and confirm our packages much faster.
1 vote -
Add option to suppress managed custom fields in comparison results
When comparing Custom Objects that contain the managed custom fields there is no way to suppress the managed custom fields. The fields would show up in the comparison results even without being requested. The problem analyzers then highlights and remove these managed custom fields.
This is cumbersome when repeated and makes finding genuine differences we care about more difficult.
From the problem analyzers, it sounds like Gearset is able to identify the managed custom fields. Therefore could there be an option under [Include managed package] in the Custom Filters that allows the suppression of known managed fields in comparison results?
8 votes -
Ability to set a friendly name to the package
Should it be possible to set an equivalent of "friendly name" in Gearset but one that can also be spread to Saleforfce.
1 vote -
add the ability to run static code analysis against an org or source control, simply click refresh button to re-run it and see results
This will give you a "run code analysis -> see results -> fix issues -> push to source control (or an org) -> repeat" workflow.
3 votes -
test class not captured in deployment history
It would be nice to capture whatever test classes ran for code coverage deployment of classes/triggers in the deployment summary in the Test Results section. You already have a section for this test results so why not add the class names used in the report. We have come across many classes deployed without their appropriate test classes and it is hard tracking/documenting which test classes were used to deploy these as there are no documentations in the class.
5 votes -
6 votes
-
Allowing data deployments in CI jobs
Allowing data deployments in CI jobs. So that configurations in third party apps and B2B Commerce can be deployed as part of CI.
6 votes -
give the ability to ignore certain changes between Sandbox and Production enviornments
After deploying from a Sandbox to a Production environment, you will always see a 'change' for Custom Objects and Custom Fields because there is no Encryption Scheme (for example)
3 votes -
Changing executing time in a Job does not automaticalely start the Jobs!!
No information is given!!
1 vote -
Be able to start immediately a JOB (CI/Unit Tests/Monitoring)
Add a button to start it immediately. Currently only solution is to change the executing time!
2 votes -
See Continuous Integration Deployments in the Deployment History tab
List deployments resulting from a CI job on the Deployment History tab along with manual deployments.
We currently deploy metadata using both manual and CI jobs and it would be convenient to see all deployments in the same list (for debugging, reporting, monitoring).
4 votes -
edit other team member's CI job
Have a way to edit other team member's CI jobs, if appropriate permissions are given.
3 votes -
Show the Label as a column in the comparison screen
At present the comparison screen, Name column, only shows the information from the API name, but not the Label (as seen in Setup > Object Manager > Label column).
When the Label is wildly different from the API name, is would be super useful to have the Label displayed as a column, instead of having to find it in the XML viewer.
1 vote -
Show the latest commit(s) in the slack notification
It would be extremely useful for the development team to see the last set of commits which were deployed via an automated job, so that if it breaks it is easier to tell what broke the build or if it is successful what the org has been updated with.
4 votes -
Ability to search Deployment History for specific metadata
On the "Deployment History" tab, the filter dialog filters on the visible friendly name and items like that. What I would like to do is enter a specific metadata name and have the list filter down to deployments where that specific metadata name was a part of the deployment. This would be useful when getting the question, "when was xyz last deployed?"
14 votesIf we implemented this and it was only able to search metadata from that point in time onwards, would that be useful or would it be confusing to communicate in the UI?
-
Allow bulk org access for new users, new org permissions upon adding
When adding a new user having the ability to give the same level of access to all orgs at once would be greatly beneficial.
Likewise, when adding a new org and having the ability to set user access to the new org would save time as well.
We are adding new orgs frequently and will be adding users as well. Saving time on permissions would be great!
2 votes -
Run test in parallel using scratch orgs
CI job that run all test takes ages. Can we use scrach orgs and test suites to run test in parelell in multiple orgs?
https://developer.salesforce.com/blogs/2018/06/running-tests-5x-faster-using-sfdx-and-heroku-ci.html1 vote -
Add system log fields for created and updated operations for filters
It will be helpful if we know who/when a filter is changed. And it would be great if we could lock the filters as an owner.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?