Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1314 results found
-
Allow record id as the first criteria for matching lookup fields
When deploying data records from production to sandbox, the default matching criteria for the owner field will not typically work...
Gearset currently matches on email and profile, but the email addresses for users get modified in sandboxes. So, no match is found for users other than the one who created the sandbox.
It would be great if the first check was: does the user record id match. If not, use email + profile, if not, use the current user.
3 votes -
display meta data filter used on deployment report
It would be useful to see the meta data filter used on the deployment successful report
3 votes -
Export of the Comparison Results
My Suggestion: For our Customer i need to create a Documentation with all the Metadata Information from the Comparison. Even for Things which are not different.
A CSV Table would be great and a HTML Documentation would be awsome :)3 votes -
Eliminate unnecessary XML reformatting in git
Currently, when gearset deploys XML to git, it seems to run it through a reformatter, which creates superfluous changes in git. These changes cause extremely large deltas, which are hard to read, increase the difficulty of merges and the likelihood of conflicts, and make working with any other metadata tooling (like SFDX) difficult.
For example, here is part of a delta gearset commited for a profile.xml:
diff --git a/force-app/main/default/profiles/Commissions.profile-meta.xml b/force-app/main/default/profiles/Commissions.profile-meta.xml
index 8b11e6b7..3d640a50 100644
--- a/force-app/main/default/profiles/Commissions.profile-meta.xml
+++ b/force-app/main/default/profiles/Commissions.profile-meta.xml
@@ -1,10 +1,27 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<Profile xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><Profile xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+ <custom>true</custom>
+ <profileActionOverrides>
+ <actionName>Tab</actionName>Note that it lowercased…
3 votes -
Give users the ability to update field/object permissions for specific profiles only
The issue is, when promoting from one org to another and changing either Custom Object Permissions or Custom Field Permissions and if more than the profile you want has been changed, the extra profile changes get promoted anyway. So we need a way to control which profiles get applied when promoting field and object level security.
3 votes -
3 votes
-
Queue Deployments
Current State:
A few devs have work in their individual sandboxes that are ready to be pushed to the higher .dev sandbox org
1st Dev deploys work to .dev
2nd Dev deployment fails because org is locked
Idea:
A few devs have work in their individual sandboxes that are ready to be pushed to the higher .dev sandbox org
1st Dev deploys work to .dev
2nd Dev deployment is queued up, 2nd Dev will be notified via email/browser when queued deployment has started
3 votes -
add the ability to run static code analysis against an org or source control, simply click refresh button to re-run it and see results
This will give you a "run code analysis -> see results -> fix issues -> push to source control (or an org) -> repeat" workflow.
3 votes -
give the ability to ignore certain changes between Sandbox and Production enviornments
After deploying from a Sandbox to a Production environment, you will always see a 'change' for Custom Objects and Custom Fields because there is no Encryption Scheme (for example)
3 votes -
edit other team member's CI job
Have a way to edit other team member's CI jobs, if appropriate permissions are given.
3 votes -
3 votes
-
Trigger a data deployment from a CI job
When we pull down a version between our local and staging environments. We would like to also automatically pull in the testing data from another project.
As one of the things we are trying to setup is taking a version from Prod then running GhostInspector through our core flows. Ideally every 4 hours we take a backup from metadata + locked down actual data. Then run tests against it.
3 votes -
Need a Lock to the Custom comparison filters
We need a lock to the custom comparison filters so that the team will be on the same page and only the deployment manager can be responsible for all the deployments
3 votes -
Allow PMD to be configured by uploading a xml file with rules
We use PMD locally in our IDEs to analyse during development, and the whole team shares a rule file in xml. It excludes the ones we don't like and configures other rules.
We can configure Gearset to do the same through the UI, but I'd rather be able to just upload the file, then I will know they are the same set of rules.
3 votes -
Show the Created Date and Refresh Date on the Draft Deployments
I understand the Draft Deployments are snapshots from when they were created or last refreshed. Is that right? Please show these fields on the Draft Deployments page.
3 votes -
Difference Viewer custom object name: include suffix __c, __x, __mdt, __e, etc
When you look in the Difference Viewer, it is not clear at all by inspection which line of Metadata Type "Custom Object" is a standard object, custom object, platform event, custom metadata type, historcial trending object, etc.
For example, Custom object Foo__c displays simply in the Name column as Foo. This is a loss of information in the difference viewer, especially if one has similarly-named custom object metadata types such as:
Fooc
Foose
FooConfig__mdtthese display as
Foo
Foos
FooConfigThe full Sobject Name gives the user hints as to perhaps other related components that need to be…
3 votes -
Optimize comparison list view
The comparison view contains a list view in a scrollable area with an line item for every metadata item in the comparison. Depending on the comparison, this list can be exorbitantly long (10k+ lines). Displaying this many elements on screen is extremely inefficient, and causes browsers to lock up when selecting the "check all" check box (because it results in thousands of incremental manipulations in the DOM). This issue also causes mobile browsers to crash when more than a thousand or so items show in the comparison results.
There is a common pattern for handling long lists like this, in…
3 votes -
Adjust dependancy on managed package versions for Apex[Class|Page]
We've found when developing classes against managed packages the class ...meta.xml includes the package version numbers. Problem is these are fixed to the exact version installed (e.g. 9.4, 9.3 etc. example below)
But then if the managed package is upgraded Salesforce, in its infinite wisdom, doesn't update these so when you come to deploy next time you have to go and manually update all the version numbers - or if you have a different version in another sandbox (to test the newer one) same thing.
Seems like something a cool deployment tool could handle and offer to fix up on…
3 votes -
3 votes
-
Indicate whether a Validated Package is enabled for Quick Deploy
T0 - You Validate a package to PROD (run all tests)
T1 - You or someone else does a deployment of something else, no matter how minor, to PROD.
T2 - You click Deploy of the Validated Package from T0, all the apex tests are rerun. This is by design per SFDC yet Gearset doesn't tell you in advance that Quick Deploy is not available. Something you think will take a couple of minutes now takes 30 minutes or more. You think you screwed up or Gearset is broken
Suggestion: On Validated Packages page and on the page of a…
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?