Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1240 results found
-
Spacing in formulas
This was marked as completed in https://gearset.uservoice.com/forums/283474-help-us-improve-gearset/suggestions/34690018-preserve-spacing-in-formulas but seems to be broken again. Formulas or criteria in WF are deployed without carriage returns, which makes formulas very messy to work with.
2 votes -
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered
Need a Integration of Gearset & Jira , once the user story is updated in Jira , My gearset job will get triggered and deploy the components related to that user story.
and once the deployment is done , update the jira ticket status as deployment done.2 votes -
mark destructive only changes as a separate difference
due to deployment limitations with salesforce destructive changes destructive changes dont necessarily reflect branch to org so these deltas are being marked as differences even though there is no way to fix other than manually in the org. these should be marked as a separate difference type for easier filtering.
2 votes -
Send different deployment notifications based on the target org type
Successful deployment notification is for all sandboxes. It would be nice if we can have a separate notification for production and sandboxes as certain people only care what goes to production. Thank you!
2 votes -
Support for WaveXmd metadata is missing
If we replace default DataSet in Einstein Analytics, it creates another type of metadata "WaveXmd". Support for the deployment of this metadata is missing from Gearset and as per discussion with Gearset team, it's a bug. Could you please fix it.
2 votes -
Show In-Progress Validation jobs when clicking 'Details' in GitHub PR
When viewing a GitHub PR and you have a status check that's in progress, clicking 'Details' should take you to the validation only job page and show all validations (including those in progress).
Currently this page only shows you completed validations which makes it confusing to use at first and you have to navigate to 'Continuous Integration' and find the validation job there.
2 votes -
Consistently position the Source > Target UI element
In the various screens of a comparison + deployment, the Source > Target element jumps around:
- Top of the page for the Comparing... page
- Middle of the page for the Compare page
- Top-left for the Comparison Summary page
- Top-right for the Deployment page
- Middle of the page for the Deployment Results pageDuring this process, I am constantly double-checking to make sure that I am using the correct Source & Destination environments so as not to make a mistake. Instead of scanning the entire screen to see where this is annotated, I would like to…
2 votes -
Display more workflow subcomponents under Workflow for Metadata filter
Currently, two sub-components display under Workflow when selecting metadata types within a filter.
- WorkflowAlert
- WorkflowRule
There's more sub-components than those two and I'd argue that there's two that are frequently used that should be included for visibility
- WorkflowFieldUpdate
- WorkflowOutboundMessage
There's 2 more, but these may be used less frequently and not needed for visibility
- WorkflowKnowledgePublish
- WorkflowTask
2 votes -
Github: Ability to select Reviewers for pull requests created in Gearset
Currently, you can create a PR after a successful deployment in Gearset. You're able to provide a description and even select it as a draft.
However, the only potentially necessary field that's missing is "reviewers". This means any CI/CD setup you have that requires an approval requires the user to go into Github just to add the reviewer.
Since Gearset would have all the team members (and those with linked github accounts), it seems it might be an opportunity to select based on that list and pass the linked username on to github in the PR creation to keep end…
2 votes -
Show/Flag what unlocked package elements are getting updated on Monitoring Jobs
When you look at the details of a monitoring job there is a field called "Packages Afftected" that shows green when is 0 and orange when >0.
There is a description that says...
Unlocked packages have been modified. View the comparison to see details.
However, when you look at the details there is nothing there to see what unlocked package element was modified. So the warning it is not very helpful at all.
Can this be implemented so that the warning is actionable.
2 votes -
The Action Order in the XML should follow the sortOrder
Sometimes there is a difference between a object because the order of the platformActionListItems are different. Sometimes an item with order 0 comes first, but it is possible that an item with 9 comes first. This is probably an error in Salesforce API, but Gearset should order this list before the comparison so 0 will always be the first item.
2 votes -
Automatic retry for Unknown Error in scratch org creation
When creating a new scratch org from either the Gearset UX or via a CI job, one often gets the Unknown Error message
Gearset should attempt to retry this error as often, a simple retry works. This is especially important for CI jobs which should not have to be attended to manually.
Of course, the better solution is to not get this error at all
2 votes -
Make CI-created scratch orgs more usable by downstream webhooks
If a CI job creates a scratch org ; and you configure an outgoing webhook in the CI configuration, the subscribers to that webhook have no way of being able to connect/authenticate to that scratch org.
The typical use case would be to run automated UX testing (Provar, Selenium)
At present, even the CI job creator can't log into the CI-created scratch org let alone any CI webhook
In addition to supporting this, there should be doc on how a downstream webhook can access the scratch org to then do useful work.
2 votes -
Add Static Analysis Notifications
For org monitoring, we can get a notification on either every run, or when the org changes.
Could we also have the option to get notification when the number of static analysis problems increases?
2 votes -
Allow standard linux path in sfdx-project.json
if path contains "./force-app" a bug appears, if we write "force-app" it works. so first one should work to
Repro step :
{
"packageDirectories": [{
"path": "./force-app",
"default": true
}],
"namespace": "",
"sfdcLoginUrl": "https://test.salesforce.com",
"sourceApiVersion": "48.0"
}Result :
Comparision failedExpected Result:
Comparision Ok2 votes -
Enable tracking / comparison of code not in the force-app/main/default folder
SFDX officially supports tracking of source within the same package in more than one folder. The "standard" folder may be used, but you are also able to create a folder hierarchy that's more akin to a "modularization"
It can for example look like this:
force-app (any names goes here)
-> main
--> default
----> aura / classes / pages
-> module1
--> aura/classes/pages
-> module2
--> aura/classes/pagesCurrently, only the metadata inside the force-app/main/default folder is seen. It would amazing if git integration could take other folders into account too. Both for Deployments from and to Git (for…
2 votes -
One stop shopping for scratch org creation
Too many steps to get a scratch org usable for use - especially when compared to a CLI script.
If the model is VCS -> Scratch Org, then the following should be doable in one step:
1 - Create scratch org
2 - Populate scratch org with metadata in VCS
3 - Populate scratch org with SObject tree data from VCS (optional)By definition, the scratch org is empty so with a properly configured filter, the VCS metadata is implicitly all NEW and can be preselected checked
If the VCS contains multiple packages, then the pipeline config could identify which…
2 votes -
Allow users to hide or collapse the middle bar of the comparison screen
I have a small laptop monitor, so screen space is pretty valuable to me when working from home. It can be difficult to do code reviews from a laptop monitor because of the middle bar, which takes up a significant amount of real estate.
I rarely use any of the controls or information in that box. It would be great to be able to collapse or hide it to allow more space for the top panel (list of metadata components) and the bottom panel (selected metadata contents)
2 votes -
Include the static code analysis report in the deployment notes so it can be integrated with Azure DevOps
We would like to have a link in the Pull Request or Azure DevOps work item to the static code analysis report so the tech leads can review the report.
2 votes -
Filter branches by tag name
In order to remove the clutter when selecting a branch to deploy to or from, allow users to apply metadata filters that dictate which branches show up in Gearset. For example, being able to specify that I only want to see feature branches.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?