Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1289 results found
-
APEX Class Change
APEX Class Changes Reporting
It would be really cool if, through the monitoring side, if a summary Excel could be created. Excel could have multiple tabs: 1 tab per class change with four columns:
col1 :original line #
col2: original line value
col3: new line #
col4: new line valueHeader could include change DateTime, source/target orgs, Gearset ID, who, etc
Thanks
Ron1 vote -
Pop Out Diff File in Comparisons
The current UI design for comparisons is very unfriendly to smaller screens. When working on a laptop viewing the comparison and the Diff files together is nearly impossible. It would be useful to be able to pop out a diff file or open it in another tab so it can be better viewed.
1 vote -
r.uzdavines@nextech.com
It would be great if I could group my Selected Items into groups or Projects, so that I could filter and just see those. Now that I've added a bunch of items for different projects, it's a little hard to quickly decipher which project it applies to. I'd like to be able to double check each Project's list right before deploying to make sure I've added everything. Maybe you can add another column and allow the user to create new values for "Projects."
1 vote -
Provide output from Gearset during the validation in terms of what tests were being run
I had unit testing jobs running ALL tests in source (full sandbox) and target (production) org - resulting in 80% and 79% test coverage. However, when I started to deploy my changes - the validation failed because test coverage was only 74%. Finally, after a few days, I figured it out.
I was just simply clicking "Validate" (i.e., did not choose specific tests). In the past - that ran "all tests". But something seems to have changed. When I picked "choose tests", about half the tests in my org were "automatically selected". I manually selected all other tests - effectively…
1 vote -
Allow users to create customized list views on the deployment history tab
It would be immensely helpful for our team, that works across dozens of production orgs and sandboxes, to be able to create deployment history filters (or list views like in Salesforce) that support filtering based on an org's mydomain, the username's domain, or the Gearset user that facilitated the deployment.
1 vote -
CI Job Email Notification with PR info
We do receive an email notification when CI job is deployed. Is it possible to know which PR is deployed with that CI Job? Now, the email notification only has the info with branch name, source, target and deployment summary. it'll be great if we can know the PR name that is associated with this CI job, some users, like QA team, will receive emails and know the PR with card info is deployed so they are ready to test. thanks
1 vote -
Data backup history log export
I would like to have the option to export a data backup history log for a specific period of time. E.g. for the last 60 days export in CSV or xls format following data:
Started, Last updated, Status, Duration, Changed, New, Deleted.For internal and external audits we are required to provide a list of backup jobs run in specific periods with details.
1 vote -
Move Failed Tests before Passed Tests when deployment Fails
Hi,
I would love to see the Failed tests to be listed above the Passed tests in case deployment fails.
Right now User has to always scroll down at the list (as you are usually not interested on what has Passed rather what Failed).
Also this shouold be super simple to implement :)
Thank you & keep up the good work,
Cheers,
O.1 vote -
Add deployment job detail info (such as date/time) at the header in the detail view
I have a markup screenshot for the above feedback but I don't find a way to add attachment here.
1 vote -
Add ability to deploy ObjectTerritory2Association object
The ObjectTerritory2Association object does not get populated in the target org for accounts that are manually assigned to territories. This object is used by Territory Management 2.0 and holds the association between accounts and territories. After the deployment, I can see that this bridge object did get populated with the territory linkage for accounts that are automatically assigned to territories. This is expected because an insert of a new account with proper firmographic information will result in the account getting tagged to the correct territory (i.e. if the Account’s “Exclude From Territory” flag is not set to True).
However, there…1 vote -
Add additional deployed packages
When combining packages for a deployment to a new source, it would be helpful if I could add additional packages to a comparison. There are times when I realize a package or two may have been missed in the original combination, and when reviewing the missing components, I realize a missed another deployed package. Without the ability to add additional packages to the comparison, I must start the combination of packages all over again.
1 vote -
Add the ability to create some custom reporting against metadata change monitoring
I would like the ability to report on changes for an org over a time period grouped by metadata type or user. Filters would be by data, user, metadata type, change type. Would like to export or email the report too.
1 vote -
When an Installed Package is installed via GS permission sets with View/Edit All Data system permission don't automatically get updated
When an Installed Package is installed via GS, permission sets with View/Edit All Data system permission don't automatically get updated for the new objects in the package like they do during a manual install. We then have to update the PS via deployment or manually or future deployments will fail with "Read All permission is required for [sObject]". I would think it would be fairly safe to allow GS to automatically add the appropriate object permissions to the perm set in the target org since Salesforce requires that all objects have, at minimum, the same level of access as the…
1 vote -
Export Validated Packages
Ability to Export Validated Packages from Grid, like Deployment History.
1 vote -
Ability for Enterprise User with Role "Owner" to Delete Validated Deployment by Other User
This feature would allow Enterprise user with Role"Owner" to Delete Validated Deployment by Other Users. The reason for doing this is that there could be packages created in error and this would allow release managers who are typically owners to cleanup.
1 vote -
Make metadata filters easier to use when you want to "include all except X,Y"
For CI jobs, it is not uncommon that you want to include all elements of a given custom metadata type except specific elements
Today, you need to have two entries - an include all (".*") expression and an exclude expression. For users who are not regex savvy, this is too complicated.
We should have "All", "Named", and "All except Named" at the top level so simple check boxes can be used.
This is particularly useful for CI jobs (whose purpose is to sync VCS w/ org) - you want to sync most everything except a few items - like Sites…
1 vote -
Add a deployed components count to the Deployment History table
We'd like the ability to view the number of changes that were deployed from the Deployment History table view so that we can quickly scan the list of recent deployments and identify certain deployments using that additional information.
1 vote -
Deploying from SF to Repo with unlocked packages can result in items deploying incorrectly
When deploying from SF to a branch that has the force-app and unlocked packages, if you deploy an item that would include the object file it deploys to the unlocked package directory instead of the default app listed in the project.json. The end result is everything related to the object is moved from the force-app to the unlocked package directory.
Steps to recreate:
Enable source tracked sandboxes
Create a new dev sandbox
Create a new branch and link it to the new sandbox
Create a new field on Contact
Edit a search layout on Contact
Use gearset to deploy the…1 vote -
Allow users to share deployment drafts across different Gearset environment
Lets say multiple vendors are working on different environments and done the deployment across all the lower environments using their own Gearset. But coming to the production org. internal team will be performing the deployments using internal Gearset. So Instead of recreating the deployment draft again, it would be very useful internal team can reuse the draft created by vendor in different Gearset environment.
1 vote -
"Dismiss/Hide Item" option for any found comparison
There are numerous "changes' that aren't actually changes (ex: logo images, Global Picklist set order). It'd be great to hide those those changes or dismiss them in a comparison to not look at them. Once it's dismissed, it's out of sight and there is no need to evaluate it every time you look at a saved comparison. It'd be clear that it was evaluated and not dismissed.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?