Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1308 results found
-
Customizable Metadata Deployment Order - Destructive change and reference changes
We should be able to define the order of metadata deployments. For example, when deleting a custom field and updating its references, we currently need two separate deployments: one for modifying references and another for field deletion. Allowing us to set the deployment order—modified references first, then field deletion—would enable this in a single deployment, streamlining the process.
1 vote -
Don't mark data deployment as successful if some records were excluded due to invalid picklist values
Currently if you deploy data and one object had records excluded, the top of the window says "Deployment completed successfully." However, in reality, part of the deployment was NOT successful. The only way to find out is to find that the record is missing or to slowly scroll looking for yellow exclamation. This should be extremely obvious since it's a failed deployment.
1 vote -
Always sort results by Name (alphabetically) as a second-level sort
If a sort has been applied to any column other than Name, apply a secondary sort to "Name" so the rows always sort alphabetically by Name.
This is most useful when sorting by Metadata Type, I'd like the results to be grouped first by Metadata Type, but then I'd like to see the results sorted alphabetically by their name.
Even if the user is sorting by Changed On, for example - if there are 100 fields all deployed on the exact same date/time (ex. Mar 26, 2025 1:19pm), you might as well sort them alphabetically by Name as well
I…
2 votes -
Precision Deployments for Flow
Please add Flow for Precision Deployment. The new flow visualization has been really great and it would be very helpful to be able to use precision deployments with them.
20 votes -
Dependency-Aware Deployment Sequencing in Gearset
Currently, deployments in Gearset can fail when interdependent metadata components are deployed simultaneously without respecting their dependencies. For example, deploying a new Lightning page that references a report or dashboard will fail if both are included in the same deployment, as the referenced report or dashboard does not yet exist in the target org.
While the current workaround is to manually split deployments into separate feature branches based on dependencies, a more intuitive approach would be for Gearset to detect these dependencies automatically when multiple related components are included in a deployment. The tool could then offer options to handle…
3 votes -
Add option to send notification to the Webex Teams for the Unit tests with the failed tests
Add option to send notification to the Webex Teams for the Unit tests with the failed tests. While setting up a new unit test job for one of our Salesforce orgs I have observed that there in no option to send the notification to the Webex Teams chats. It would be critical to our org as we use Webex.
2 votes -
Allow environment variables be applied to all environments except specified
Allow environment variables to be applied to all environments and specify exceptions for which they should not be applied.
For example, if an email address is stored in source control as prodsupport@example.com it should be transformed to sandboxsupport@example.com for all environments except prodcution.
1 vote -
Add the ability to hover on the New, Changed, Deleted bubbles on the COMPARE & DEPLOY Results Screen and see the meanings
Can use the wording from the documentation :)
1 vote -
After a package is validated, link to the Salesforce Deployment ID
Gearset already does this for a deployed package, that on the Deployment Summary page it shows the Salesforce ID of that deployment. Can we provide the Salesforce ID for a validation build against a Salesforce environment as well?
1 vote -
scroll bars
Get rid of the scroll bars in the open pull requests tab caused by the queue section overflowing its bounds.
Also, allow us to post screenshots here. :\
1 vote -
Audit changes to the "Require issue tracking" setting
As a result of a query by our auditors it would be helpful to have changes to the 'Require issue tracking' deployment setting audited. They are concerned that a team-owner could alter this to perform a deployment then reinstate it, resulting in change deployment without tracking.
1 vote -
Add "Open Branches" Tab to Development Sandbox Environments in Pipeline
The only way to deploy an existing feature branch into a development sandbox is to perform a manual compare and deploy. Previously, we had our developer sandboxes set up as static environments which allowed us to create PRs against them for "re-deploy". This is not possible with the new Development Sandbox format. I suggest another tab be added called "Open Branches" which will allow the developers to select a feature to pull and work on in their development environment. That way we get the benefit of easy compare & deploy instead of having to manually compare and deploy. This will…
4 votes -
sandbox seeding size
When deploying data to sandboxes, it would be helpful to get an approximation of the amount of data and file space a seeding job will need. I have on numerous occasions hit storage limits as a developer sandbox only has 200 megabytes of usable space.
1 vote -
Add an option to ignore ".forceignore" files
When a repository contains a forceignore file, deployments to that repo will not include these elements.
Sometime however it might be necessary to explicitly deploy these elements (e.g. manually).I propose to add a flag "Ignore .forceignore" at least for manual comparisons + deploys to be able to still push generelly ignore components to the repository.
1 vote -
It would be great to have a centralized way to view all components and static code analysis results for every commit within a branch.
It would be great to have a centralized view for all components and static code analysis results across every commit within a feature branch. For example, if a developer makes five commits to the same branch, it would be much more efficient to review the components and static code analysis results for the entire branch in one place, rather than checking each commit individually through the deployment history. Additionally, there should be an export option to easily share the results with developers. Thanks
3 votes -
Show duration for comparison jobs
While the Comparison History screen shows when a comparison job was initiated, it would be extremely helpful to display the duration of that comparison job, from when it was initiated, to when it was completed.
Ideally, this would show on the Comparison History screen, and/or on the actual Comparison screen itself after it was completed.
1 vote -
Visibility settings for 'Shared Sandboxes' in the gearset pipeline
Currently, Gearset only supports the binary visibility settings for sandboxes; either the developer could see his/her sandbox or everyone's sandbox. But in the case of a 'Shared Sandbox,' there is no ability to give visibility access only to a specific subset of users in the pipeline.
1 vote -
Please add support for GenAI objects
Backups are currently failing when GenAI metadata objects are selected. Please add support so that we can backup agentforce related metadata.
1 vote -
Seed Data alongside Feature Branch Promotions to Orgs
The idea is to bundle the data that should be tested along with the feature branch, so that once a story is deployed the data is also available (similar to one of Copado's features).
This allows us to test regardless of dev, partial or full copy sandbox type. Allow for a set of data to go along with a feature for testing reports and analytical tools. Possibly integrate existing Seeding Templates that can be paired with a feature branch. Allow for configuration of data deployments to environments through the CI job for feature+data deployments. Allowing some environments to refuse the…
1 vote -
Add navigation into elements of LWC bundle in difference viewer
The current LWC difference viewer shows the components linearly from top to bottom - meta, css, html, js. Just like you did with the side bar navigator for layout, add a side bar navigator for the LWC bundles
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?