Skip to content

Help us improve Gearset

We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.

If you need any further support, please contact us at team@gearset.com.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1361 results found

  1. Enable AccountContactRelation standard object as part of data deploy

    After chatting with support, it seems to be impossible to deploy an AccountContactRelation record when IsDirect = TRUE, meaning the AccountContactRelation is between a Contact and its primary Account.

    When I try deploying an Account record, Contact record and the AccountContactRelation record that joins them as top-level objects in the same deployment, I receive the error "INVALIDCROSSREFERENCE_KEY:You can't associate a private contact with an account.:ContactId --", presumably because in the order of operations, the Contact hasn't been updated with the Account lookup yet.

    When I try splitting this into 2 deploys, deploying the AccountContactRelation alone as part of…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Bug  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Download multiple objects at once from a backup run

    Given the related nature of many objects within a Salesforce Org. It would be helpful to be able to filter on and select records from multiple objects in a single data download.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data backup  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. API to Manage CI Jobs

    I would like an API to manage CI Jobs and Sandbox connections.

    In our current workflow, we create new sandboxes and branches for large initiatives. Along with these, we need to connect the SB in Gearset, build the CI job, run it for the first time, and then tear it down when we're done.

    We would like to be able to automate some of this.

    1. I have a branch and a sandbox
    2. I want to connect that sandbox in Gearset (would be great to do this programatically via api)
    3. create a CI job via api
    4. be able to run the…
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. API to Manage CI Jobs

    I would like an API to manage CI Jobs and Sandbox connections.

    In our current workflow, we create new sandboxes and branches for large initiatives. Along with these, we need to connect the SB in Gearset, build the CI job, run it for the first time, and then tear it down when we're done.

    We would like to be able to automate some of this.

    1. I have a branch and a sandbox
    2. I want to connect that sandbox in Gearset (would be great to do this programatically via api)
    3. create a CI job via api
    4. be able to run the…
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add the ability to track who configuration changes to pipeline, CI jobs, etc...

    It would be nice to see when there's a configuration was changed such as required test configuration on a CI job or pipeline configurations.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Changing API Version should make it obvious to save filter before CI Job can be saved

    It's a usability bug, I think.
    When you change the API version in a CI Job, the button to save CI Job greys out but has a spinning dial of 'Something happening'. Actually the system is doing nothing, it is waiting for the filter to be saved (even if the filter wasn't saved before) but this is completely unclear.
    Changes then
    1. auto-save filter or bring up the 'save filter' modal
    2. Show a toast message saying "save filter"
    3. Button should grey out with hover text of "save filter", no spinner

    I waited longer than I care to admit,…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Bug  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add a link to open the deployment when a change is being promoted

    The pipeline view only shows that a deployment is "running" after promoting a change. It would be useful to have a link to the deployment job and be able to view the deployment status in gearset.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Mobile Support

    Support mobile devices.

    The CSS Used for the Pipeline Environment popover prevents the browser from scrolling horizontally. You can try this be logging into Gearset on your phone's browser or by narrowing the browser width on your desktop.

    1. I want to deploy from my phone.
    2. I want to monitor PRs from my phone.
    3. I want to browse my Scheduled Jobs and Monitoring Jobs.
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Creating branch names from JIRA summaries can cause very long path names

    Gearset automatically creates a branch name from JIRA summaries. Windows paths are limited to 260 characters.

    error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/gs-pipeline/portal/SFBUS-33389/Update-Include-in-Export-formula-on-the-Intake-Criterio
    n-object-to-prevent-Intake-Tasks-and-Intake-Document-Checklists-from-pulling-when-associated-to-a-process-that-is-not-included-in-
    the-export-stage': Unable to create 'C:/Users/E19187/Repos/salesforce/.git/refs/remotes/origin/gs-pipeline/portal/SFBUS-33389/Update-Include-in-Export-formula-on-the-Intake-Criterion-object-to-prevent-Intake-Tasks-and-Intake-Document-Checklists-from-pulling-when-associated-to-a-process-that-is-not-included-in-the-export-stage.lock': Filename too long

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bug  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Update Test naming convention matching to work with implementation classes

    We are using fflib and the AEP enterprise design pattern. As part of this design pattern we have interfaces and implementations for our Service layer classes. E.g. we will have something like ILumpSumService and LumpSumServiceImpl. When we create a test class it would be something like LumpSumServiceTest. So it would be great if the logic could be updated to match use cases where you have an implementation class like that. Also, I think any net new test classes added should be executed no matter what

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Testing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Add a notes field to environment variables to contain the scenarios it's addressing.

    For example, the RegEx allows finding of many different patterns that can all be handled by a single regular expression. Down the road it's less obvious which situations the regex was intended for. Having a simple notes field could be quite helpful.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Add a notes field to environment variables to contain the scenarios it's addressing.

    For example, the RegEx allows finding of many different patterns that can all be handled by a single regular expression. Down the road it's less obvious which situations the regex was intended for. Having a simple notes field could be quite helpful.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Restore feature branch when a mid-flight promotion branch is restored

    Have just experienced a scenario where closing a PR that is mid-flight in the pipeline caused the promotion branch and underlying feature branch to be deleted. So far, so good in terms of expected behaviour due to my pipeline settings. However, after restoring the promotion branch in order to reopen the PR and promote it in the pipeline, the next environment on the pipeline did not then show the change. This, I believe, was because restoring the promotion branch DID NOT restore the feature branch. Therefore there was no source to create a new promotion branch from in order to…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Create a mass back propagation button

    Its very time consuming to have to back propagate one by one to each org. Please create a mass back propagation button.

    Also when back propagating where more than one connection to an org exists for instance our techdebt org has several admin connections and I have to hit update on all of them. Make the back propagation smart enough to know that it only needs one update rather than on each connection to the same org

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Feedback Search Bar

    On the Feedback page place the Search bar at the top. Its odd that it sits at the bottom of the right panel

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bug  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Grouping more than five sandboxes should not hide them

    When grouping sandboxes, having more than 5 in a single group adds a scrollbar, and hides any additional sandboxes added to the group. This decreases visibility into sandbox status. I missed that there were several sandboxes that were very out of date simply because I couldn't see them on the pipeline. All sandboxes on the pipeline should be visible for visibility.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Please update your "Configure and deploy" option to allow the user to limit the records that will be masked in an object. We only want to m

    Please update your "Configure and deploy" option to allow the user to limit the records that will be masked in an object. We only want to mask our homeowner records in Account and Contact. We do not want to mask our dealer records. If we could limit the records that are being masked by using record types, this would enable us to use your solution. Thanks!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data deployment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add an integration for Google Chat that includes an integration for Change Monitoring and Unit Testing.

    Recently, it seems that Google Chat has reached some feature parity with Slack in that it has a defined integration avenue for adding notifications to Google Chat. I have found that I can set up a custom webhook to Google Chat for the CI jobs, but webhooks are not available on the other 2 features I am looking for notifications from.

    I would either like to have:
    a.) An integration for Google Chat with an app on the Google Chat side that we would add for the connection to our Gearset
    b.) Webhook availability for more notifications, so I can…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Feature Request: Deployment Blocking Based on Daily Unit Test Job Status

    Currently, Gearset lacks a feature to block deployment CI jobs to the respective environments when the associated daily unit test job fails. Implementing this feature would be advantageous in ensuring that appropriate testing quality gates are established to prevent changes from being deployed in the event of test failures. This enhancement would significantly improve our deployment integrity and testing processes.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Allow backup job permissions to be control by Roles

    Backup permissions are separate from the Roles, causing duplicate permission maintenance. Please allow backups to use Roles instead

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data backup  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base