Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1360 results found
-
Ability to "Hide" Sandbox Groups on Pipeline Page
In the Pipelines page, it would be very helpful if we had the ability to "hide" entire sandbox groups from view. This would make it much easier to quickly find and focus on the environments that are relevant to the logged-in user.
Ideally, this "hidden group" setting would persist across logins and page refreshes, similar to how the "collapse group" feature currently works.
I'm sure an "unhide groups" feature will be needed with this as well, in case a previously hidden group becomes relevant again.
1 vote -
Allow Archive Notifications for both successful and failed runs
Currently, when an archiving policy runs, you can send out a notification if a run has been successful or a notification when a run has failed. I cannot see a way to have both notification types as I would like to see at a glance how many records have been archived in each run, but I also need to know when it fails with permission issues after deployments or major releases. I do not go into the Archive section every day.
1 vote -
Provide a Model Context Protocol (MCP) for Gearset
It would be really helpful if there were a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Gearset. As companies are adopting AI LLM tools as part of their day-to-day work, integrations with tools like Gearset become a necessity and MCPs are becoming more and more available, even Salesforce has support now (https://developer.salesforce.com/blogs/2025/06/introducing-mcp-support-across-salesforce).
As an example, we use Claude Deskop connected with an Azure DevOps MCP (https://github.com/microsoft/azure-devops-mcp) to connect to ADO. Claude helps assess priorities, organize releases, check for duplicate issues, and even identify issues that have fallen through the cracks.
Expanding on that, it would be really…
1 vote -
add support for lightning types (LightningTypeBundle)
Add support for lightning types (LightningTypeBundle)
1 vote -
Adaption of Deployment frequency of CI jobs
While setting up a CI job, I recognized there are only automatization options up to every 24 hours, which is once a day. Currently there is no possibility to deploy e.g. every second day or even more important to us, every week/ every second week. Please add this possibility when adding CI jobs, to have a slower Deployment cycle to e.g. demo sandboxes, that don't need daily deployment.
2 votes -
Display the developer who opened the PR throughout the entire pipeline flow.
As a Release Manager, I have difficulties identifying the developer responsible for the PR.
The developer's name only appears when they open the PR at the beginning of the process, and in the following stages, it shows the system user's name from git that Gearset uses to open the PRs up to production.
Since I need to easily know who opened the PR during the release creation, I have to open the feature card to find the developer. ...
1 vote -
Enable multiple orgs to act as build agents for single pipeline step
Occasionally our queue is backed up waiting for dozens of PR's to validate, this happens because a single org can only validate one PR at a time. It would be helpful for a solution that allows us to attach multiple orgs (sandboxes or scratch orgs) to a pipeline step such that multiple PR's could be validated in parallel. Then when a PR is deployed it could easily be deployed to all of the attached orgs.
1 vote -
Solution for enabling parallel builds validations, i.e. multiple build agents
Occasionally we have a backup in our queue PR validations where dozens of tickets all have to individually wait for there spot in line to validate. It would be great if we could spin up multiple orgs (sandboxes or scratch orgs) and attach them to a single pipeline element such that each org could help load-level the validation queue.
1 vote -
Preserve Precision Selections through Fetching the Latest
You're precision selections feature is absolutely amazing! Every time I use your tool it just gets better and better and this feature has me hooked. It's been huge with lightning web pages which often have multiple changes in UAT and need to be separated for deployment.
We prep deployments before sending to UAT. Occassionally, there has been a big delay since the package was originally validated. If I need to go back to the original draft deployment and refresh the selected items to ensure I'm not overwriting something else that went out, the precision selections are cleared.
- There is a…
1 vote -
allow us to automate the PR Syncs after a shedule deployment occurs
due to drift occurring because of the environments being out of sync after a deployment occurs I would love the capability to scheduel an automated PR sync after a successful scheduled release deployment occurs. like a checkmark box on a per sscheduled deployment basis.
1 vote -
Customizable Metadata Deployment Order - Destructive change and reference changes
We should be able to define the order of metadata deployments. For example, when deleting a custom field and updating its references, we currently need two separate deployments: one for modifying references and another for field deletion. Allowing us to set the deployment order—modified references first, then field deletion—would enable this in a single deployment, streamlining the process.
2 votes -
Make components searchable across features in the pipeline
If I know the name of a component, Can you give me a way of searching through the pipeline to see what features it resides in, where they are and when it was deployed please
1 vote -
Deployment Failures in Pipeline
The flow of a pipeline promotion is as such:
- Validate deployment to org
- (on success) Merge PR into base branch AND move PR to "Recent Promotion History" tab
- Deploy to org
IF the deployment fails at that point, or is partially successful it would be great to denote that somewhere within the CI job within the pipeline. This would give the devs.admins more visibility into the true state of their features. Maybe we don't even move to the next environment until after a successful deployment.
1 vote -
Automatically Backfill Dev Environments with Pull Request When Changes Are Promoted Downstream
Description:
Currently, Gearset’s pipeline tool does a great job of back-propagating changes between static environments when a change is made further down the pipeline. However, this behavior does not extend to developer environments, even if the change originated from a feature branch tied to that dev environment.Problem:
If a developer starts work on a branch in their dev environment, and then that branch is promoted down the pipeline (e.g., through UAT, Staging, etc.), and changes are made to the branch further down (e.g., hotfixes, last-minute edits), those updates do not automatically get proposed back to the original dev environment.…
1 vote -
Add Monday.com as a source for User Stories
Add Monday.com as a source for user story integration
1 vote -
Enhancement Proposal: De-merge Option for Gearset Branch Management
Currently, Gearset provides a helpful feature to merge branches, which is ideal for creating a Release branch that bundles all related components. However, it would be a valuable enhancement to introduce a de-merge or selective unmerge capability. This would allow teams to easily remove specific feature branches from a Release branch particularly useful in scenarios where some stories are pending approval or need to be excluded from the release at the last minute.
Such a feature would improve flexibility during final release preparation and reduce the need for manual branch adjustments or rework.1 vote -
Deploy CustomLabel by label separately
The automated deploy (CI) filter does not have the resources to deploy isolated CustomLabels, so that specific labels can be included or excluded.
1 vote -
load more items
Please stop using "Load more items..." as the way to load more table items. It's very annoying to have to say show me the last 30 days but then click the button 20 times to get there.
I'm referring to the Promotion history page but anywhere this concept is used should be ripped out.
1 vote -
Please add support for decomposeCustomLabelsBeta
Salesforce added the option to configure multiple features in the DX Project Configuration file. One of the is breaking down the big CustomLabels file into individual files where we no longer need to deploy the whole file but just a file (label) that has changes in. Please see SFDX Documentation here - https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.sfdx_dev.meta/sfdx_dev/sfdx_dev_ws_config.htm
11 votes -
Stop Off-setting Partial Selections when a Package is 'Fetched' for the Latest
Hi,
Our team creates individual draft deployment packages and then we consolidate it into one package and fetch for the latest before validating. In some of our individual draft deployment packages we are selecting partial changes to a page layout or a lightning record page but it is off-setting this partial change and we are given the prompt: 'Precision selections have been reset for these items'. Is there a way we can fetch for the latest without off-setting these partial changes?
Thanks!
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?