Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1355 results found
-
New Feature: Filter Custom Fields (and other sub-components) in Comparison Filters
I'd like to be able to exclude certain custom fields from my comparison.
For example we have fields that have environmental differences between orgs that we don't want to deploy. There are also random fields on standard objects that show up as "different" even though they aren't and it would be nice to filter them out.
4 votes -
Ability to compare data between two backups
It would be great if you could compare data between two backups. Currently you can only see what has changed since the last backup.
1 vote -
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable)
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable) so that there is a way to store it i.e. in Git and see how various jobs, cicd pipelines, monitoring and schedulers are configured which is an enterprise way to implement solutions nowadays (PaaS, IaaS etc..)
2 votes -
Ignore "trackHistory" comparison if an Org has "FALSE" and Git does not define this entry
The Salesforce CLI system returns the Custom Field Metadata XML file without a "trackHistory" entry if it is set to false. This XML entry is optional in the Custom Field metadata type. However, once we deploy such metadata to the org and execute compare between a branch and the org again, it shows differences, saying that "trackHistory == false". But is "false" by default. So I would recommend you ignore this entry if SF Org returns FALSE and the VCS file does not have this item.
1 vote -
Add the ability to run the problem analyzer while on the comparison screen
I originally was going to request the ability to append the items found in problem analyzer to the list of selected components, when going back to view the comparison, but then I thought why not take it one step further, and move the problem analyzer feature to the comparison screen? Then, the items it finds/suggests, the user can add them to the package there, or choose to ignore them.
3 votes -
add the option to either hide source control locations where you do not have a connection, or allow a default SCM connection to be selected.
We only use on source control service, so having to select 'Azure DevOps' before being able to select the repo/branch, is a small step that adds up over time.
Being able to either hide services that you do not already have a connection for, or being able to default to a service, with the ability yo navigate back up and over, as needed. would be welcomed.
3 votes -
Allow Deployment Notes to be editable post-deployment
Allow Deployment Notes to be editable post-deployment. Our team uses very specific notes for auditing purposes, and being able to edit them post-deployment would make that process a lot easier for our teams.
3 votes -
I want to be able to share 'delegate org access' with other team member(s) so they can visually see our security / deployment structure
I want to be able to share 'delegate org access' with other team member(s) so they can visually see our security / deployment structure for reporting.
In this example the fact that "user A owns the connections and has delegated the permission to user B" is not visible to user C. Ideally user C would be able to see that delegation information for auditing purposes.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
APEX Class Change
APEX Class Changes Reporting
It would be really cool if, through the monitoring side, if a summary Excel could be created. Excel could have multiple tabs: 1 tab per class change with four columns:
col1 :original line #
col2: original line value
col3: new line #
col4: new line valueHeader could include change DateTime, source/target orgs, Gearset ID, who, etc
Thanks
Ron1 vote -
Pop Out Diff File in Comparisons
The current UI design for comparisons is very unfriendly to smaller screens. When working on a laptop viewing the comparison and the Diff files together is nearly impossible. It would be useful to be able to pop out a diff file or open it in another tab so it can be better viewed.
1 vote -
r.uzdavines@nextech.com
It would be great if I could group my Selected Items into groups or Projects, so that I could filter and just see those. Now that I've added a bunch of items for different projects, it's a little hard to quickly decipher which project it applies to. I'd like to be able to double check each Project's list right before deploying to make sure I've added everything. Maybe you can add another column and allow the user to create new values for "Projects."
1 vote -
Ability to audit what users have done in Gearset
Hi, I suggest there should be a feature which monitors what the users within your orgs have done in Gearset. As we can currently are able to view both comparison and deployment history, however this does not give an audit trail of who has changed what and where.
For Example, the ability to review changes that a user has made to gearset comparison filters.6 votes -
Add an Undo Action/Functionality in the Comparison UI
Add an Undo button to the comparison UI in case someone accidentally de-selects a component from the Selected Items tab. It would save time rather than having re-search for the component and lose your train of thought. You have this feature in Google Docs and sheets.
2 votes -
Rename the Name bar in compare and deploy to : Name (api)
Simple to implement, just a string rename...
Rename the Name bar in compare and deploy to : Name (api)
It would show clearly that the name displayed there is the API name, not the "label" name XD
Cheerio2 votes -
Allow the creation of CI Jobs against Salesforce orgs that we are delegated to, instead of needing to be owner.
We have 2 admins that we want to be able to create all of the CI and Pipeline Jobs, even if they don't have their own credentials in a particular Salesforce org. They have Deployment delegation, and can run compare and deploys, but not set up integration jobs.
This is then requiring us to either, provision extra licenses in each sandbox for our DevOps administrator, or have the developers create the CI jobs, which they are not comfortable with.
And, as we start the Pipeline Pilot, we would like to leverage all of the existing CI jobs, but, that is…5 votes -
Provide output from Gearset during the validation in terms of what tests were being run
I had unit testing jobs running ALL tests in source (full sandbox) and target (production) org - resulting in 80% and 79% test coverage. However, when I started to deploy my changes - the validation failed because test coverage was only 74%. Finally, after a few days, I figured it out.
I was just simply clicking "Validate" (i.e., did not choose specific tests). In the past - that ran "all tests". But something seems to have changed. When I picked "choose tests", about half the tests in my org were "automatically selected". I manually selected all other tests - effectively…
1 vote -
Add option to make picklist fields non-restricted before performing a data deployment
Similar to being able to disable validation before performing a data deployment it would be very useful if there was an option to automatically uncheck the "Restrict picklist to the values defined in the value set" option for some or all of the picklist fields in a deployment.
We have data that includes picklist values that are no longer active this causes errors on individual records as part of the load. Currently I have to pick through all the errors manually then uncheck the option for the corresponding picklists fields on the target org. Then after performing the deployment I…
4 votes -
Ability to mark certain branches as your favorite branch so you can pick them quickly
When selecting a branch from source control, it would be great if Gearset had an ability to mark certain branches as favorites so they appear the top of branch selection dropdown.
3 votes -
sfdx repo deployment should be in subcomponents
Context: Compare and Deploy from Org to a Repo.
as i understand it, even if my repo is in SFDX format (Object subcomponents), Gearset still does the compare in the metadata format.
it reads the components from sfdx, combines into a .object form, and then applies the changes to the .object file and then decomposes again.this is causing unintentional changes to be part of our PR
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?