Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1361 results found
-
Allow the capability to deploy to multiple Salesforce organizations within one deployment
Currently you can only push to 1 Salesforce org, however, we manage multiple organizations and would like the capability to push the same package to multiple organizations
2 votes -
Notification of unresolved CI job failure
As the owner of the CI job pipeline, I would like notifications when there are ongoing failures to the CI jobs that I select so that I do not have to continually monitor the jobs as a part of my day-to-day.
Acceptance criteria:
- The current-state suite of notifications on CI jobs will still be available.
- When a CI job has failed and the failure has not been cleared within X number of hours, the notification will be triggered.
- Each CI job should have blocker notifications enabled separately.
- Users will be able to select from SMS, email or both.
- Users will…
1 vote -
provide the ability to add tags to branches within Azure DevOps.
Within Azure Devops you can group commits and changes into a release based on a tag. So for a user to be able to add that tag when they are associating a workitem to a commit would mean they didn't have to go into Azure Devops later to add the tag.
3 votes -
Trigger a Gearset CI deployment from an Azure DevOps release approval event
Right now Gearset supports the set up of webhooks into azure devops which trigger deployments when a branch is updated.
I'm looking for an extension to that feature to also include "approval completed" steps. These are already available to hook into within Azure DevOps, so I'm hoping it'd should be a relatively small piece of work to extend GS to support this
4 votes -
Replicating Data should include backups as a source
Currently its possible to replicate data from a backup job by going into the backup run and clicking replicate data.
However, this is extra steps... its would be good if you could just select backups as a source from the data deployment screen.
1 vote -
Allow team member to create unit test job based on the shared connection
I try to create the unit test job but the org connection is available to me even it is shared to me with the deployment permission. I have to either create a new connection or let my colleague who is the owner of the connection do it now,
Thank you!
1 vote -
New Feature: Filter Custom Fields (and other sub-components) in Comparison Filters
I'd like to be able to exclude certain custom fields from my comparison.
For example we have fields that have environmental differences between orgs that we don't want to deploy. There are also random fields on standard objects that show up as "different" even though they aren't and it would be nice to filter them out.
4 votes -
Ability to compare data between two backups
It would be great if you could compare data between two backups. Currently you can only see what has changed since the last backup.
1 vote -
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable)
Gearset configuration as a Code (git or exportable) so that there is a way to store it i.e. in Git and see how various jobs, cicd pipelines, monitoring and schedulers are configured which is an enterprise way to implement solutions nowadays (PaaS, IaaS etc..)
2 votes -
Ignore "trackHistory" comparison if an Org has "FALSE" and Git does not define this entry
The Salesforce CLI system returns the Custom Field Metadata XML file without a "trackHistory" entry if it is set to false. This XML entry is optional in the Custom Field metadata type. However, once we deploy such metadata to the org and execute compare between a branch and the org again, it shows differences, saying that "trackHistory == false". But is "false" by default. So I would recommend you ignore this entry if SF Org returns FALSE and the VCS file does not have this item.
1 vote -
Add the ability to run the problem analyzer while on the comparison screen
I originally was going to request the ability to append the items found in problem analyzer to the list of selected components, when going back to view the comparison, but then I thought why not take it one step further, and move the problem analyzer feature to the comparison screen? Then, the items it finds/suggests, the user can add them to the package there, or choose to ignore them.
3 votes -
add the option to either hide source control locations where you do not have a connection, or allow a default SCM connection to be selected.
We only use on source control service, so having to select 'Azure DevOps' before being able to select the repo/branch, is a small step that adds up over time.
Being able to either hide services that you do not already have a connection for, or being able to default to a service, with the ability yo navigate back up and over, as needed. would be welcomed.
3 votes -
Allow Deployment Notes to be editable post-deployment
Allow Deployment Notes to be editable post-deployment. Our team uses very specific notes for auditing purposes, and being able to edit them post-deployment would make that process a lot easier for our teams.
3 votes -
I want to be able to share 'delegate org access' with other team member(s) so they can visually see our security / deployment structure
I want to be able to share 'delegate org access' with other team member(s) so they can visually see our security / deployment structure for reporting.
In this example the fact that "user A owns the connections and has delegated the permission to user B" is not visible to user C. Ideally user C would be able to see that delegation information for auditing purposes.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
APEX Class Change
APEX Class Changes Reporting
It would be really cool if, through the monitoring side, if a summary Excel could be created. Excel could have multiple tabs: 1 tab per class change with four columns:
col1 :original line #
col2: original line value
col3: new line #
col4: new line valueHeader could include change DateTime, source/target orgs, Gearset ID, who, etc
Thanks
Ron1 vote -
Pop Out Diff File in Comparisons
The current UI design for comparisons is very unfriendly to smaller screens. When working on a laptop viewing the comparison and the Diff files together is nearly impossible. It would be useful to be able to pop out a diff file or open it in another tab so it can be better viewed.
1 vote -
r.uzdavines@nextech.com
It would be great if I could group my Selected Items into groups or Projects, so that I could filter and just see those. Now that I've added a bunch of items for different projects, it's a little hard to quickly decipher which project it applies to. I'd like to be able to double check each Project's list right before deploying to make sure I've added everything. Maybe you can add another column and allow the user to create new values for "Projects."
1 vote -
Ability to audit what users have done in Gearset
Hi, I suggest there should be a feature which monitors what the users within your orgs have done in Gearset. As we can currently are able to view both comparison and deployment history, however this does not give an audit trail of who has changed what and where.
For Example, the ability to review changes that a user has made to gearset comparison filters.6 votes -
Add an Undo Action/Functionality in the Comparison UI
Add an Undo button to the comparison UI in case someone accidentally de-selects a component from the Selected Items tab. It would save time rather than having re-search for the component and lose your train of thought. You have this feature in Google Docs and sheets.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?