Help us improve Gearset
We love getting feedback from our users on how we can make Gearset even better. Post your ideas for improvements, new features, and bug fixes alike, and vote for others – let us know what’s important to you.
1231 results found
-
Ability to choose whether or not to respect the forceignore file
Would like a checkbox on the comparison screen that allows me to choose whether or not the comparison will respect the contents of the forceignore file. (Similar to the checkbox allowing you to choose whether or not the comparison should use the package.xml file).
Our usage of Gearset does not align with our usage of the forceignore file for automated deployments. In fact, we often use Gearset to manually compare and/or deploy items that we specifically ignore for automated deployments.
Summary of problem this new feature has introduced:
We use gearset for org -> git deployments, and for git ->…5 votes -
Validation Job to validate feature/* branch by scratch org creation
The idea is to validate feature branches in repo. For doing this it's necessary to allow specifying source branch by pattern (like feature/*) in "Add CI validation job" menu. The validation should check whether the code breaks the scratch org creation or not. This is valuable due to fragility of scratch org creation process (sfdx force:source:push).
5 votes -
Add Analyzer to Warn/Remove Named Credentials with Passwords
Currently, attempting to deploy a named credential will fail as a "password is required for the specified authentication protocol".
This can mean manual work if you have a lot of CI deployment jobs to sandboxes or annoyance if you expected to be able to deploy it.
It'd be great if an analyzer existed that would alert/warn the user about it going to fail and unable to be deployed (suggest removing it from the package)
5 votes -
Bash scripting
Add support for bash scripting. This is one of the most powerful features of Jenkins and something that would make a huge difference in Gearset.
5 votes -
Scratch orgs with packages with InstallationKeys fails to install in CI
When creating a new scratch org you have the option of specifying the package and the installation key. This option is not available in a CI job to scratch org target scenario.
When there are dependencies specified in the sfdx-project.json file that requires an installation key the CI job run fails when the CI tries to install them.
There needs to be a way to specify the installation key, either by a custom JSON field in the sfdx-project.json, or on the CI job itself.
5 votes -
Ability to use Sandbox Source Tracking features as opposed to a comparison filter
The comparison screen is great to help admins and declarative users see the changes they made. However, it still requires them to know which metadata to pull based on changes they made.
Source tracking in Sandboxes is in beta and would alleviate this concern.
https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=sfdx_setup_enable_source_tracking_sandboxes.htm&type=5
If Gearset could leverage this functionality (potentially leveraging SourceMember object or storing .jsons to track last modified times as local projects store) it would make the complete process easy to use for all alike (pull metadata, select diff, deploy).
5 votesWe’re currently working on a technical spike to incorporate source tracking capabilities into how we retrieve metadata. We’ll keep you updated on progress.
Regards,
The Gearset Team
-
OAuth support for outgoing webhooks
Currently outgoing webhooks support only basic authentication. It'd be useful to have oAuth support for outgoing webhooks for enhanced security.
5 votes -
Jira Integration: Include the option to add a comment in JIRA with the URL of the pull request created from Gearset + Assign reviewers
After a deployment to a git branch, gearset allows to create the pull request from Gearset. It would be nice to:
1. Have an option to add the pull request URL to the deployment notes
2. Have the capability of add reviewers (users from the git repo) into the Pull Request5 votes -
Add a tab for Items that the Items I Selected Depend On
It would be so cool if there could be a tab that shows all the items that my selected items depend on. It would be much easier to review / select them then the way I do it now, which is expanding each item in the Selected Items tab to check for things I need to add.
Thanks!
5 votes -
For Deleted components, "Changed On" date should be date component was Deleted
After doing a major changes in an org, one can be left with a lot of deleted components to deploy. In the comparison view, they don't show up as expected. The Changed On" date isn't the date deleted. It uses the last modified date in the destination. So deleted something last week could up as last modified 2 years ago.
Ideal: Gearset would to get the Setup Audit Trail via API and display the actual deleted date of deleted components5 votes -
Modify the "Changed On" drop down filter groupings to round to the nearest day, rather than the exact time the change was made.
It would be helpful if in the "Changed On" dropdwn filter if it grouped it into days, rather than the exact time the change was made. Also, if there were preset groupings like "Today","Yesterday","Last 7 Days", etc.
5 votes -
create a compare/deploy function for data similar to metadata
having something like new/different/deleted for data (so we can compare, say, products vs new product options or features) like we do for metadata
5 votes -
Save deployment analysis suggestions and list of test classes
In order to make deployments more repeatable between orgs please allow a way to save the selection of deployment analysis suggestions an d list of test classes with a package. With a large package it can be difficult having to document or remember the same selections used in deployment to UAT org for Production deployment.
5 votes -
view deployed components live
Show live the components deployed during the running of a CI/CD Job.
Like:
deploying class abc.......
deploying class xyz.......
deploying lightning Component abc.......5 votes -
Only display active branches when displaying branches from a bit bucket cloud repository
Only display active branches when displaying branches from a bit bucket cloud repository
5 votes -
allow a method to set up default branches.
I frequently deploy from our on premises GitLab repo. It would be great to have the ability to set the default branch it goes to. It would be one less click for repetitive steps
5 votes -
Display a custom name in Salesforce when deploying from Gearset
When we deploy a change to one of our Salesforce orgs using gearset, the name that is displayed in the "Deployment Status" in Salesforce is an ID. It would be helpful to display the name that we entered in Gearset instead of the ID so that we can easily identify the changes when looking at them in Salesforce
5 votesHi,
We have recently investigated adding this feature again, but unfortunately Salesforce still don’t seem to support being able to display custom names via the Api (or it’s a feature that’s not well documented). There are requests for adding this ability via:
https://success.salesforce.com/ideaView?id=08730000000cJdxAAE
If the situation changes then we’ll certainly revisit this. We’ll keep this post opened for other users to also add their votes but it’s currently out of our hands as to when or if it can be added.
Regards,
The Gearset Team
-
Provide an option to run Aura and/or LWC testing before deployment
I don't think that very many people are actually creating Aura/LWC tests yet, but they really should be.
Since SF doesn't require them like it does for Apex, if we decide that those tests ought to be run before deployment, it would be great to have Gearset run them. This will help us to make sure they are run before every deployment instead of relying on developers remembering to do it manually.
5 votes -
test class not captured in deployment history
It would be nice to capture whatever test classes ran for code coverage deployment of classes/triggers in the deployment summary in the Test Results section. You already have a section for this test results so why not add the class names used in the report. We have come across many classes deployed without their appropriate test classes and it is hard tracking/documenting which test classes were used to deploy these as there are no documentations in the class.
5 votes -
Allowing data deployments in CI jobs
Allowing data deployments in CI jobs. So that configurations in third party apps and B2B Commerce can be deployed as part of CI.
5 votes
- Don't see your idea?